anybody score the rematch for either fighter like this in pac jmm ll?
AFTER REWATCHING IT
in all due respect please be reasonable, did anybody here have it 116-111 for either pac or jmm in the rematch?
anybody score the rematch for either fighter like this in pac jmm ll?
AFTER REWATCHING IT
in all due respect please be reasonable, did anybody here have it 116-111 for either pac or jmm in the rematch?
Ikariam
After watching the fight yet again, I decided to score a round 10-10. As opposed to 10-9. So my scorecard now reads 116-112 Marquez. Any one who scored it for Pac after watching it yet again is just a Pac groupie. It was a clear Marquez win.
Did anyone see Max Kellerman nut-hugs JMM last night?![]()
Unbelievable.
Yeah OK not exactly how it works but keep telling yourself that...and Pac does not hit 10 times harder so save the tall tales for the guys on the block...harder yes 10 times no....and just because a guy does not hit as hard does not mean he has to land 10 times more....footwork, ring generalship, accuracy, making your opp miss, conmtroling the tempo, and about 10 more things are all factors in judging a fight..
Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!
well done, thats very smart of younow your a bit backpaddling, ooh ok you score 10-10 rounds now, still come up with 116-112
![]()
If it was a clear JMM win then why does 2 judges score it for pac? are thy just pac groupies under you calculation?
Why don't you just give the fight credit, it was a close fight that was won by pac. If Jmm could quit landing on his back then he'll have a better case for winning.
Look at jmms whole face, from his forehead to his upper lips. SWOLLEN just like Erics face was. They look like they were wearing one of those zorro mask.
Violent Demise is like garnish on a plate, he's just there for show. I highly doubt he even watches fights, just trys to be as argumentative as possible for attention. This is the same guy who said he had no problem with Casamayor getting a gift win in his fight with Cruz because he has been robbed in the past. Like that is somehow justification for robbing another fighter of a win. I mean when people say preposterous things like that, I doubt they expect to be taken seriously.
if thats his way of justifying casa robbery win over santa cruz then he should look at it this way.
If the judge hadn't mis-score the first bout between pac jmm in the first round, pac would of won split decision like the rematch.
If the ref would of scored the knockdown for mab in the jmm vs mab then jmm could have had a lost against mab.
Two solid points, since casa has been rob in the past accourding to v.d. then those to points i pointed out should be enough for him to sleep at night since he thinks jmm won 116-111![]()
I had it 114-113 Marquez i felt that he did the better work on the whole he controlled the pace of the fight and anticipated what pac was going to do landing quality counter right hands consistently. 116-111 is a complete joke and how anyone could score it that way is a blatant fanboy close fight enjoyed every minute definatly my fight of the year so far as the fight combined ring smarts of both boxers and controlled agression
That comment right there shows how much of an idiot and groupie you really are. If you read my previous comments you'll see I gave Pac credit for his effort. I said he was game and showed heart. Like always. I just think he lost the fight. Which he really did.
What's the problem? The problem is that I didn't suck his dick like you Pac groupies do. That's the problem with you flips. It ain't enough that people give Pac credit. They got to get on there knees and deep throat Pac just like you guys do. They got to say Pac is the greatest. They got to say Pac won. Even though he really lost. They got to say Pac is number 1 p4p even though he's not. Fuck all that. I'm a boxing fan. Not just a groupie to a certain fighter like you are
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks