Thread: Hopkins Run In?

Over the last 5 years after he fights Pavlik will look like this........ Robert Allan,Oscar De La Hoya,Howard Eastman,Jermain Taylor twice,Antonio Tarver,Winky Wright,Joe Calzaghe,Kelly Pavlik when nearly every other Boxers of his age has retired!!

U got to respect that?! Has any other Boxer had a harder run in than that over the last 5 years?? Could proberbly make a case for Pac.

And you missed out a fellow p4p'er in Joey Calzaghe.. So more props.. Even a lotta guys say Hop won that fight..

For real.. Thats why Bernard is P4P

Originally Posted by Tito BHB

And you missed out a fellow p4p'er in Joey Calzaghe.. So more props.. Even a lotta guys say Hop won that fight..

For real.. Thats why Bernard is P4P

Realised that when I post it,then the computer crashed! Thats 6 P4P level fighters he's fought in the last 5years,nobody can match that!

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Originally Posted by killersheep

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Originally Posted by njackets

Originally Posted by killersheep

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Winky Wrights is pretty impressive also

Yeah B-hop is the man. The most impressive thing is Bernard has been competative in all of those fights, and has won most of them. Even in defeat it's razor thin and could go both ways. Like stated above many people think he even won all of them.

Hopkins resume is overated.

His 3 best wins are over fighters much smaller....Tarver was a good legit win though.

Originally Posted by TommyGunn_

Hopkins resume is overated.

His 3 best wins are over fighters much smaller....Tarver was a good legit win though.

If Bhops record is overrated, whose isnt?

Originally Posted by purtyboy

Yeah B-hop is the man. The most impressive thing is Bernard has been competative in all of those fights, and has won most of them. Even in defeat it's razor thin and could go both ways. Like stated above many people think he even won all of them.

Hopkins & Hagler the two best middleweight ever

Originally Posted by njackets

Originally Posted by killersheep

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Roy Jones

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

Originally Posted by njackets

Originally Posted by killersheep

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Roy Jones

I disagree in he has fought a washed up Tito that come out of retirement and had never fought at that weight,before that was Hanshaw and Prince Badi Ajamu and then he lost his 3 fights previous.

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

Originally Posted by njackets

Originally Posted by killersheep

No doubt Hopkins resume is among the best of active fighters.

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Roy Jones

Dont be silly Jones resume is legenderaly weak.

Muhammad Ali had a strong level of opponent throughout his career. That to me is what proved how great he was.

Originally Posted by Markusdarkus

Originally Posted by Boom Boom

Originally Posted by njackets

Think only maybe Oscars and Pacs is better,maybe make a case for Mosley,anyone else?

Roy Jones

Dont be silly Jones resume is legenderaly weak.

Some of his light heavy defences 1995-2000 are questionable I would have to agree.