What gives with this man ?
He stops Manfredo against Calzaghe when he seemed more than capable of continuing ..
But he allows Khan to continue after first knockdown when he could hardly stand !!
Bit naughty Terry, the boy could have been badly hurt
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
What gives with this man ?
He stops Manfredo against Calzaghe when he seemed more than capable of continuing ..
But he allows Khan to continue after first knockdown when he could hardly stand !!
Bit naughty Terry, the boy could have been badly hurt
Array
Nah, Khan had him just where he wanted him.
Array
'Come on what a daft statement, who employs Mr O Conner? Mr ive got no bigtime fighters left Warren. Says it all really'
Nothing 'daft' about the statement at all (though your appraisal of it could be considered 'daft')
NB: O' Connor, three o's
Last edited by zzutak; 09-07-2008 at 02:57 AM.
Array
Well lets have a look at the two situations, Calzaghe v Manfredo:
Terry stops the figher who is not contracted to Mr Warren a tad to early, then in the other fight you want to compare, Terry lets the fighter who is contrated to Mr Warren go on to long.
So my conclusion is Terry does as much as he can for the fighters who are employed by the same guy who employs him, so not so daft after all.![]()
So you seriously believe O' Connor would endanger a fighter's wellbeing (as he clearly did last night) because said fighter is contracted to the promoter ?
Array
Put it this way if the Columbian was in the same way as Kahn was for the first knockdown id put the mortgage down on Terry stopping the fight.
You may have a point
Always been a very inconsistent ref though O' Connor and without wishing to be insulting have you seen the size of the man, don't the BBBC have any fitness requirement for refs ??
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks