Thread: Kessler interview/article

Oversat udgave af http://www.sporten.dk/kessler-saetter-ambitioner-over-penge


translate is crap,sorry

No one deserves a shot at the Taylor v. Lacy winner more than Mikkel. Franky, I cannot see what other options the Taylor v. Lacy winner has than to face one of the beltholders at 168 lbs next. He'll go for Kessler because he is the best and the best known too. Kessler should be seen as the clear favourite against either Taylor or Lacy and a win against whoever wins should put Kessler in the picture in America.

• You'll have Dawson - but he won't want to get anywhere close to someone like Kessler anytime soon,
• Hopkins, who might be more interested in Dawson than in Kessler, though, if the doesn't retire against RJJ, say,
• RJJ, who could possibly be tempted to take another big money fight against Kessler...and that's about it,
• until Bute proves he is indeed good enough and makes a name for himself, if he ever does, of course. Of course, there's the
• American prospects at 168 too...but they won't hit the scene in a big way until 2010, I'd reckon.
• Then, there's Froch, if he wins a belt - a big unification fight could be made there for Kessler...

Originally Posted by jangeorg

Franky, I cannot see what other options the Taylor v. Lacy winner has than to face one of the beltholders at 168 lbs next.

By virtue of being a WBC-sanctioned fight (eliminator?), the winner of Taylor-Lacy (i.e. Taylor) is set to meet the winner of Froch-Pascal for the now vacant WBC title. As much as I'd like to see the winner in against Kessler, you cannot really argue with taking that road.