Can somebody just get rid of the WBA alreadyEither that or just call it the Don King Productions Belt.
Fucking jackasses
WBA: No unification fight! | Fightnews - Boxing News Updated 24/7
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
Can somebody just get rid of the WBA already
Fucking jackasses
WBA: No unification fight! | Fightnews - Boxing News Updated 24/7
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
well technically Valuev has the WBA title, so i'm assuming the winner of Chagaev/W. Klitschko would fight him for the WBA title to well unifyOriginally Posted by Lyle
Can somebody just get rid of the WBA already
Fucking jackasses
WBA: No unification fight! | Fightnews - Boxing News Updated 24/7
Bam Bam... BamBamBam!!!
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
The best response is.... "Who Cares?"
Belts means nothing anymore. Wlad doesn't need them, and neither do any of the other top fighters.
"Now speak only fists"
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
It's a joke but your man is right; belts don't mean shit anymore.
You do a commercial and you're off the artistic roll call... forever
--Bill Hicks
Old Guard
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
True, belts mean sweet FA
Shah Khan
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
Meh, belts only matters for up and comers anyway, not established fighters.
I mean didn't Lennox Lewis get stripped of his WBA belt for not fighting Ruiz a few years back? And then Ruiz won it?
What does that tell you if Ruiz can be a heavyweigth "champion?"
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Surprise Surprise, the WBA title NOT on the line
What a joke. The WBA used to be the main player in the game and now they are making a mockery of the sport.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks