Thread: Al Bernstein On Boxing: Manny Pacquiao - One For The Ages

While we all wait for the apparently inevitable announcement that Manny Pacquiao will fight Miguel Cotto, I think it’s wise to really sit back and try and put the Pacquiao story in perspective. Our goal here is to come up with some historical perspective that is reasoned.

In doing that you would think that the exploits of Pacquiao would take on less superhuman traits and be viewed through... Full Boxing Article here...

Astonishing career indeed.

Originally Posted by Saddo

While we all wait for the apparently inevitable announcement that Manny Pacquiao will fight Miguel Cotto, I think it’s wise to really sit back and try and put the Pacquiao story in perspective. Our goal here is to come up with some historical perspective that is reasoned.

In doing that you would think that the exploits of Pacquiao would take on less superhuman traits and be viewed through... Full Boxing Article here...

Great article by Al bernstein!! Finally... a credible writer recognizing How Great Pac is!!! While most boxing fans & Writers in the net not brave enough to compare Pac with the Greats like SRL & Duran. Bernstein now clearly seeing how Pac will be Viewed in History.

I myself was Proud of what I have predicted about Pac. You can google anything from the fighter Pac has fought, his assession to the P4P ranks, in the manner Pac will beat his opponents, to the Money he's about to make, and to the All time rankings Pac's about to achieve, and I almost predicted everything right.

Great points Al about Hatton and ODLH you have to be realistic and ask yourself what any other top fighter would have done to ODLH in that state and a seriously poor wide open Hatton. That's not Mannys fault though he did the job.

But yeah if he beats Cotto at 147 it would be unreal. Cotto has fought faster guys before and with Cotto being pretty much bang in his prime I think he takes Pac to a world of pain. If Manny wins I would expect Floyd to price himself out and Mosley to step in maybe.

A thoughtful article, although somewhat reserved, explores a historical perspective of the importance of Manny Pacquiao's exploits in the square ring.

Major kudos to Al Bernstein, a boxing mind, knowledge of solid repute and genuinely, calibrated old school!

Here at Saddo, the same line of thought at present or at least in the not so distant past, have received powerful backlashes. The established trend is intriguing! It also makes it difficult to be a Pac fan. To be a Pac Fan is to own balls of steel if one is to convey any praise towards the relevance of Pacquiao to boxing. Otherwise, the silent mode. The community-friendly preferred mode.

Truth be told, anything about Pacquiao being great runs contrary or contrastingly to that of what we here at Saddo Boxing maintain and hold sacred.

Actually there is truth that we may only begrudgingly hold Pacquiao P4P king, because popular opinion says so, and not that we believe so.

At times, to the wonder and amazement of true Pac fans like myself, this Pacquiao under recognition can be a source of resentment, and a situation difficult to address. My hats off to those who can.

Why such stubborness in the acquiescence of Pacquiao's greatness?
Outside that of personal preferences, personal biases, I am stumped. Your guess is as good as mine.

I am on borrowed time here... so let's just allow the "Bernstein" to hash the hard facts. I myself would certainly not, not even the least bit. I have not entertained the thought of carrying on with such task in the past, am not giong to start now.

I merely stated my observations, and the intent is to offend no one. The effort was purely to express an agreement to those points brought up by Al Bernstein's piece, and to a lesser degree, to shed light to the oddness of being a Manny Pacquiao fan.

Pacquiao's greatness in the boxing world is solid. With still, a potential to attain even more!

Shouldn't we be glad that the phenomenon that is "the PacMan", is happening? Right before our very eyes, in our generation?

I certainly do.

Originally Posted by KananKrus

A thoughtful article, although somewhat reserved, explores a historical perspective of the importance of Manny Pacquiao's exploits in the square ring.

Major kudos to Al Bernstein, a boxing mind, knowledge of solid repute and genuinely, calibrated old school!

Here at Saddo, the same line of thought at present or at least in the not so distant past, have received powerful backlashes. The established trend is intriguing! It also makes it difficult to be a Pac fan. To be a Pac Fan is to own balls of steel if one is to convey any praise towards the relevance of Pacquiao to boxing. Otherwise, the silent mode. The community-friendly preferred mode.

Truth be told, anything about Pacquiao being great runs contrary or contrastingly to that of what we here at Saddo Boxing maintain and hold sacred.

Actually there is truth that we may only begrudgingly hold Pacquiao P4P king, because popular opinion says so, and not that we believe so.

At times, to the wonder and amazement of true Pac fans like myself, this Pacquiao under recognition can be a source of resentment, and a situation difficult to address. My hats off to those who can.

Why such stubborness in the acquiescence of Pacquiao's greatness?
Outside that of personal preferences, personal biases, I am stumped. Your guess is as good as mine.

I am on borrowed time here... so let's just allow the "Bernstein" to hash the hard facts. I myself would certainly not, not even the least bit. I have not entertained the thought of carrying on with such task in the past, am not giong to start now.

I merely stated my observations, and the intent is to offend no one. The effort was purely to express an agreement to those points brought up by Al Bernstein's piece, and to a lesser degree, to shed light to the oddness of being a Manny Pacquiao fan.

Pacquiao's greatness in the boxing world is solid. With still, a potential to attain even more!

Shouldn't we be glad that the phenomenon that is "the PacMan", is happening? Right before our very eyes, in our generation?

I certainly do.

Are you fucking kidding me? Goddamn, what a pretentious post. Gentlemen (and ladies), we have found the Terry Nutkins of Pacfans.

I've yet to see anyone on here seriously deny the greatness of Manny Pacquiao in any credible way. Everyone on here acknowledges that he is an all-time great and that we are privileged to be watching his career unfold before us. Exactly how great he will prove to be is a topic of legitimate discussion and I don't see any problem with people expressing varying views. Nobody dislikes Pacquiao, that's almost impossible, it's some of his fans who create the backlash against him.

Anyways, on to someone relevant, great article Al. Beating Cotto at 147, which I think Pacquiao would be able to do, would be an amazing accomplishment and the best of an already storied career. If he beats Mosley and/or Mayweather in addition to Cotto, I would argue that he is one of the top 5-10 fighters of all time.

Edit: When I said top 5-10 I meant he could arguably be ranked anywhere on a list of the top 5 or 10 fighers ever.

You have the coolest avatar CHF.

As a Pacquiao fan, I am truly grateful to Al for giving his assent on my seemingly presumptuous assertion that Pacquaio belongs to the "historical and all great category". Plagued with ridicule and innumerable personal assaults in this benighted forum for saying my mind and what i truly believe about Pac, Al's article is akin to a redeeming grace for us pacfans.

To Al,

With the crown of snow there cometh wisdom. Thank you from the deepest recess of my heart.

Originally Posted by brucelee

As a Pacquiao fan, I am truly grateful to Al for giving his assent on my seemingly presumptuous assertion that Pacquaio belongs to the "historical and all great category". Plagued with ridicule and innumerable personal assaults in this benighted forum for saying my mind and what i truly believe about Pac, Al's article is akin to a redeeming grace for us pacfans.

To Al,

With the crown of snow there cometh wisdom. Thank you from the deepest recess of my heart.

If we are so woefully ignorant then why are you still here?

I refer you to my response to Kanankrus for my opinion on this matter, I have pretty much the same thing to say to you as I said to him but I don't feel like typing it all out again.

Originally Posted by CFH

Originally Posted by brucelee

As a Pacquiao fan, I am truly grateful to Al for giving his assent on my seemingly presumptuous assertion that Pacquaio belongs to the "historical and all great category". Plagued with ridicule and innumerable personal assaults in this benighted forum for saying my mind and what i truly believe about Pac, Al's article is akin to a redeeming grace for us pacfans.

To Al,

With the crown of snow there cometh wisdom. Thank you from the deepest recess of my heart.

If we are so woefully ignorant then why are you still here?

I refer you to my response to Kanankrus for my opinion on this matter, I have pretty much the same thing to say to you as I said to him but I don't feel like typing it all out again.

please check your definition of benighted. I used that word to mean "unenlightened" not ignorant. The reason I'm still here is impliedly provided.

Originally Posted by brucelee

Originally Posted by CFH

Originally Posted by brucelee

As a Pacquiao fan, I am truly grateful to Al for giving his assent on my seemingly presumptuous assertion that Pacquaio belongs to the "historical and all great category". Plagued with ridicule and innumerable personal assaults in this benighted forum for saying my mind and what i truly believe about Pac, Al's article is akin to a redeeming grace for us pacfans.

To Al,

With the crown of snow there cometh wisdom. Thank you from the deepest recess of my heart.

If we are so woefully ignorant then why are you still here?

I refer you to my response to Kanankrus for my opinion on this matter, I have pretty much the same thing to say to you as I said to him but I don't feel like typing it all out again.

please check your definition of benighted. I used that word to mean "unenlightened" not ignorant. The reason I'm still here is impliedly provided.

Semantics. It means essentially the same thing.

Edit: Here's a definition of the word benighted:

–adjective 1. intellectually or morally ignorant; unenlightened: benighted ages of barbarism and superstition. 2. overtaken by darkness or night.

Anyways, I'm done with this. It is/was not my intention to derail the thread about Al's article but when people take shots at the forum and it's members I feel the need to step in.

Originally Posted by CFH

Originally Posted by brucelee

Originally Posted by CFH

If we are so woefully ignorant then why are you still here?

I refer you to my response to Kanankrus for my opinion on this matter, I have pretty much the same thing to say to you as I said to him but I don't feel like typing it all out again.

please check your definition of benighted. I used that word to mean "unenlightened" not ignorant. The reason I'm still here is impliedly provided.

Semantics. It means essentially the same thing.

Sorry bro. I beg to dissent. The two are not the same. I used the word benighted not to degrade the forum but to show appreciation to Al's contribution to this forum. No offense meant.

Originally Posted by brucelee

Originally Posted by CFH

Originally Posted by brucelee

please check your definition of benighted. I used that word to mean "unenlightened" not ignorant. The reason I'm still here is impliedly provided.

Semantics. It means essentially the same thing.

Sorry bro. I beg to dissent. The two are not the same. I used the word benighted not to degrade the forum but to show appreciation to Al's contribution to this forum. No offense meant.

I copied a dictionary definition and put it in my previous post.

Originally Posted by brucelee

Originally Posted by CFH

Originally Posted by brucelee

please check your definition of benighted. I used that word to mean "unenlightened" not ignorant. The reason I'm still here is impliedly provided.

Semantics. It means essentially the same thing.

Sorry bro. I beg to dissent. The two are not the same. I used the word benighted not to degrade the forum but to show appreciation to Al's contribution to this forum. No offense meant.

I think it would be BeKnighted, as in made a knight, as in arise Sir Al.....

Originally Posted by KananKrus

A thoughtful article, although somewhat reserved, explores a historical perspective of the importance of Manny Pacquiao's exploits in the square ring.

Major kudos to Al Bernstein, a boxing mind, knowledge of solid repute and genuinely, calibrated old school!

Here at Saddo, the same line of thought at present or at least in the not so distant past, have received powerful backlashes. The established trend is intriguing! It also makes it difficult to be a Pac fan. To be a Pac Fan is to own balls of steel if one is to convey any praise towards the relevance of Pacquiao to boxing. Otherwise, the silent mode. The community-friendly preferred mode.

Truth be told, anything about Pacquiao being great runs contrary or contrastingly to that of what we here at Saddo Boxing maintain and hold sacred.

Actually there is truth that we may only begrudgingly hold Pacquiao P4P king, because popular opinion says so, and not that we believe so.

At times, to the wonder and amazement of true Pac fans like myself, this Pacquiao under recognition can be a source of resentment, and a situation difficult to address. My hats off to those who can.

Why such stubborness in the acquiescence of Pacquiao's greatness?
Outside that of personal preferences, personal biases, I am stumped. Your guess is as good as mine.

I am on borrowed time here... so let's just allow the "Bernstein" to hash the hard facts. I myself would certainly not, not even the least bit. I have not entertained the thought of carrying on with such task in the past, am not giong to start now.

I merely stated my observations, and the intent is to offend no one. The effort was purely to express an agreement to those points brought up by Al Bernstein's piece, and to a lesser degree, to shed light to the oddness of being a Manny Pacquiao fan.

Pacquiao's greatness in the boxing world is solid. With still, a potential to attain even more!

Shouldn't we be glad that the phenomenon that is "the PacMan", is happening? Right before our very eyes, in our generation?

I certainly do.

Speak for yourself there in the first half of your post!
Im happy for Manny and happy for his countrymen they deserve a break at the top,just look at their history.

I think to state what you have and generalize us all at Saddos in order to separate yourselves as "True Manny fans" doesnt help Manny or your cause at all.

Only the real old school here will remember I felt the leaders of the sport will eventually be Asian because they are growing larger every generation with red meat in the diet,better medicne, better genetics being passed along etc. They also have the many martial arts styles of training to pick and chooce from, also they havent got trainers stuck in old ways, they evolve and take in what is useful and cut out what is not where as many western boxing schools will show you the door if you show them anything they dont already use that works. Im glad Mannys style was natural to him and only after setting himself firmly has the western training polished him further and right on time.

Jealousy is strange though and has two ends to it, it makes some guard what they have and further seperate themselves so they feel more privalaged and for some others it makes them attack those who have got the best; but that sure isnt 50/50 its about 5% from either end of both ridiculuos thought patterns.

As for the Mexicans and some others who bet heavily into the Mexican side: they have lost alot of cash privatley to the Phillipino people. That would hurt and you could drag them into a stoush match over anything regarding Marquez and Manny as a few of you do that and mean to do it.

Unfortuantely some of Mannys fans are not as humble as the man himself.