
Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
I Lust For Violent D
Yes, it was blood. Here's an article I forgot to post the other day.
Arturo Gatti's last few hours | Other Sports | Sports | Toronto Sun
The statement that get's me is this.....
Police Chief Paulo Alberes said the blood didn't begin running from the wound on Gatti's head until after 9 a.m. "probably when Amanda went back down and she figured out that he was dead by shaking him."
WTF!!!! The blood didn't begin to run out of his body until long after he was dead!!! That's Mickey Mouse detective work there.
Hmm.. I dunno. It sort of makes sense if you believe the second autopsy from Canada. The second autopsy found there were no signs he was beaten. Yet there's evidence he suffered a head wound earlier in the evening during the fight, which obviously couldn't have been serious according to the autopsy findings, her shaking him could have re-opened the wound spreading the blood.
That would explain her not thinking anything was wrong when first seeing him.
Is it more likely he was depressed, got drunk and hanged himself (which is fairly common), or she strangled him to death and faked his suicide? I think probably the former.
No, actually it was the second autopsy that found markings and bruising that wasn't reported on the first autopsy.
As far as the blood, he had been dead for hours, blood would not flow out from her shaking him.
What I want to find out is if it was blood, or just red blood cells that was on the floor? If it was blood, then more than likely he was still alive when he hit the floor, and the blood would flow since he still had blood pressure to push it out. But if it was just red blood cells, then he would have been dead when he hit, because hypostasis begins almost immediately after death, which means that the heavier red blood cells settle at the bottom portion of the body, while the plasma separates and goes to the top. And the only way that the red blood cells would have exited his body after death, is if the the wound was on the bottom, as in touching the floor, the pressure of the red blood cells settling could cause some oozing. But if it's true that the wound was at the back of his neck, that scenario wouldn't be possible, since according to the crime scene photo the back of his neck was not touching the ground.
So basically, what I'm saying is, that the blood had to be there when she first seen him at 6:00 am, and there's no way she could not have seen that.
Bookmarks