Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 91

Thread: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    You have to be pretty naive if you think Dirrell was going to get the decision, fighting like that, in the other guys backyard.

    Come on now.

    The fight was a boring, ugly, messy letdown.

    Hold, foul, hold, duck/spin round, hold, pose, hold, run, hold.. boring, boring, boring.

    Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    You have to be pretty naive if you think Dirrell was going to get the decision, fighting like that, in the other guys backyard.

    Come on now.

    The fight was a boring, ugly, messy letdown.

    Hold, foul, hold, duck/spin round, hold, pose, hold, run, hold.. boring, boring, boring.

    Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost.

    oxymoron.

    Froch is shit.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Dirrell didnt start holding and grabbing until Froch started all of his dirty tactics and Dirrell saw that the ref was just letting Froch do whatever he wanted.

    I think Dirrell even in loss proved three things:

    - Froch has a suspect chin
    - Froch's power is overrated
    - Froch doesnt have good fundementals and is slow as molasis

    I wish Dirrell would have just standed and traded with Froch, he would have gotten froch out of there.
    PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
    The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Llandudno
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    924
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter View Post
    Froch has a suspect chin
    Say what?! Firstly how did he prove this, by tapping him on the chin as he was jumping away? And secondly, wouldn't the evidence of the Pascal fight suggest overwise?
    You do a commercial and you're off the artistic roll call... forever
    --Bill Hicks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Froch is shit, slow, has overrated power and an overrated "grainite" chin. We all knew that beforehand.

    But he "won"

    Dirrell/Team Dirrell couldn't have expected to win being that negative though. If so they are a very naive outfit. And got what they deserved.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1035
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Froch is shit, slow, has overrated power and an overrated "grainite" chin. We all knew that beforehand.

    But he "won"

    Dirrell/Team Dirrell couldn't have expected to win being that negative though. If so they are a very naive outfit. And got what they deserved.


    He won with a bad decision and lost a lot of respect, Froch has terrible skills and everyone knows it and he has no chance of winning the tourney. The family is not naive, if you watched the fight you would know his trainer told him he would not get a decision here and needed a KO. I love that first post from you quoted below.

    "Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost."

    The travesty is the guy who actually landed some punches lost on the cards.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    There were a lot of times where he was punching to the back of the head when Dirrell wasn't even ducking or anything. And even then you should not be allowed to cock your arm up in the air and punch down onto the back of a guy's head Something tells me that's illegal.

    But Skel I have no issue with the ref taking a point from Dirrell for holding. Hell take one earlier and keep taking them if he keeps doing it consistently. But you could tell clear as day there was only one fighter the ref was paying attention too. That's pretty obvious when you warn a guy after he's punched in the back of the head four or five times. The ref doesn't have to be British to be incrompetent.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by stebs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Froch is shit, slow, has overrated power and an overrated "grainite" chin. We all knew that beforehand.

    But he "won"

    Dirrell/Team Dirrell couldn't have expected to win being that negative though. If so they are a very naive outfit. And got what they deserved.


    He won with a bad decision and lost a lot of respect, Froch has terrible skills and everyone knows it and he has no chance of winning the tourney. The family is not naive, if you watched the fight you would know his trainer told him he would not get a decision here and needed a KO. I love that first post from you quoted below.

    "Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost."

    The travesty is the guy who actually landed some punches lost on the cards.
    They would have been better off telling him beforehand he wont win a decision fighting so negative instead of telling him he needs a KO in the 12th.

    See, proves my point, totally naive.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1180
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter View Post
    Dirrell didnt start holding and grabbing until Froch started all of his dirty tactics and Dirrell saw that the ref was just letting Froch do whatever he wanted.

    I think Dirrell even in loss proved three things:

    - Froch has a suspect chin
    - Froch's power is overrated
    - Froch doesnt have good fundementals and is slow as molasis

    I wish Dirrell would have just standed and traded with Froch, he would have gotten froch out of there.
    The trading part I somewhat agree. I actually think there were times that Direll was actually outslugging and hurting Froch.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1400
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    I wouldn't say Froch has a suspect chin. He has a solid chin at worse.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Taylor and Direll are both not HUGE punchers and Taylor dropped Froch hard and Dirrell seriously wobbled him a fewtimes.....This equals suspect chin....
    PETA = People Eating Tasty Animals
    The only Acceptable Gun Control Law: Always use two hands when firing.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    970
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter View Post
    Dirrell didnt start holding and grabbing until Froch started all of his dirty tactics and Dirrell saw that the ref was just letting Froch do whatever he wanted.

    I think Dirrell even in loss proved three things:

    - Froch has a suspect chin
    - Froch's power is overrated
    - Froch doesnt have good fundementals and is slow as molasis

    I wish Dirrell would have just standed and traded with Froch, he would have gotten froch out of there.
    Agreed.

    but the other two i don't think can be questioned with the same authority; is it Froch's lack of power or Dirrell's good chin?... Froch didn't touch the canvas, and was stunned once, maybe twice in the fight and recovered well...and AGAIN, didn't go down.

    Getting wobbled by a good punch means you have a suspect chin?
    "...went 12 rounds with Ali, and never took a backwards step."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    You have to be pretty naive if you think Dirrell was going to get the decision, fighting in the other guys backyard.

    Come on now.

    The fight was a boring, ugly, messy letdown.

    Hold, foul, hold, duck/spin round, hold, pose, hold, run, hold.. boring, boring, boring.

    Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost.
    100% agree. There was no way Fraud was going to be allowed to lose no matter what. Fraud could of been shut out and still would of got the win. If he would of been dropped they would of been ruled slips. The fix was in from the beginning.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,509
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    You have to be pretty naive if you think Dirrell was going to get the decision, fighting like that, in the other guys backyard.

    Come on now.

    The fight was a boring, ugly, messy letdown.

    Hold, foul, hold, duck/spin round, hold, pose, hold, run, hold.. boring, boring, boring.

    Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost.

    didnt dirrell actually THROW more punches then frotch?



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Dirrell deserved to lose. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    You have to be pretty naive if you think Dirrell was going to get the decision, fighting like that, in the other guys backyard.

    Come on now.

    The fight was a boring, ugly, messy letdown.

    Hold, foul, hold, duck/spin round, hold, pose, hold, run, hold.. boring, boring, boring.

    Dirrell won the fight but it would have been a travesty had Froch lost.
    Didn't get chance to get on here yesterday, got in at 6.30 am after the fight and slept all day.

    Haven't managed to watch this on tv yet, but up to round 6 this fight was horrible to watch, I felt that Dirrell was a super middleweight version of Junior Witter and terribly negative, with Froch so wide open and flailing shots and bulling around. It was actually painful to watch for a while. I like Froch as he won't back down to anyone, but when Dirrell actually decided to fight rather than run, hold or fall over he looked fantastic, but he only did that for three rounds maybe four IMO so i'm glad he didn't win. He looked to land on Froch with ease. He was like a switch hitting Mayweather with his running and rope sliding.

    Two things after witnessing this live.

    1. Froch is going to get knocked out by Mikkel Kessler, and possibly even Arthur Abraham.

    2. Dirrell, if he clicks the switch on in his brain much earlier than round 9, atleast 4, from here on in could really pose a threat to absolutely anyone at SMW. His timing, accuracy and speed were fantastic, just no where near enough of it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-13-2008, 09:17 PM
  2. Brock & Tim Got What They Deserved!
    By Magickstricks13 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 05:01 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 02:54 AM
  4. Got what they deserved!
    By motorcitycobra in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-13-2007, 05:05 AM
  5. This was a well deserved draw.
    By BABABOOEY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 07:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing