Thread: Eubank vs froch?

Who wins?
In what fashion?

I see chin similarities with both these guys but see froch having the higher workrate in second half.

most of the fighters in the super 6 would have outpointed Eubank , he probably outpoints Abrahams , as he is made for him.

All the rest outpoint Eubank as he has little stamina.

Froch wins UD 118 - 110

Eubank had excelent stamina, when it mattered. He stopped both Benn and Watson late.

I think Froch is far too open for Eubank and his looping over hand right.

Originally Posted by ross

Eubank had excelent stamina, when it mattered. He stopped both Benn and Watson late.

I think Froch is far too open for Eubank and his looping over hand right.

Benn was stopped on an eye injury , and he koed Watson with a 1 in a million haymaker.
He did not have good stamina he was one paced.

Froch is too 'busy' for Eubank and would've won a decision imo.

Where's DD, he needs to be in on this discussion!

Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al

Originally Posted by ross

Eubank had excelent stamina, when it mattered. He stopped both Benn and Watson late.

I think Froch is far too open for Eubank and his looping over hand right.

Benn was stopped on an eye injury , and he koed Watson with a 1 in a million haymaker.
He did not have good stamina he was one paced.

Not against Eubank he wasnt? He was stopped because he was out on his feet and Eubank was all over him landing punches

Joe Calzaghe has said himself that Eubank gave him his hardest fight and obviously this includes the same Kessler that beat Froch. The Eubank Calzaghe fought was weight drained after accepting the fight With Calzaghe on less than 2 weeks notice at supermiddle when scheduled to fight at light heavy.

Eubank would beat froch.

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Eubank would beat froch.

U didn't say how!! In a tear up froch drops eubank endlessly

Eubank vs Froch would be a good fight. Eubank was technically better, but Froch loves a tear up and could catch Eubank. A prime Calzaghe beats them both. As a side note, what about Benn vs Froch - if they were the same era that would be a fight to behold too!

It would be a very close fight that goes to points, I dont know why anyone would think any different.

Eubank was far too fast for Froch, going to the body and getting out the way, moving laterally and coming in from angles. Froch couldn't do much with him.

Both a bit erratic both big egos both likely to make mistakes both likely to frustrate both us, themselves and each other... Could go either way would most definately go the distance.

Eubank could be out hustled and rhythm broken but the Froch I last saw was too inactive and wide and a bit off balance, he lacked pressure. I go with Eubank close with timing having much to do with it

Tell you what they'd have to get a separate ring just to fit the egos of these two no doubt

This is a mismatch. Froch is slow, plodding and struggles desperately with quick hands, quick feet and quick reflexes. Eubank has lots of body to aim at, get in and out, use his lateral movement and flexibility. It's just a mismatch.