Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Should Dawson have fought on?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    771
    Cool Clicks

    Default Should Dawson have fought on?

    In my opinion Dawson made the right decision. I think everyone knows how much they're willing to take! Dawson reached his limit of pain, humiliation and disgust and said I'm done! What do you think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1497
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    There was no point in him continuing, I think anything past that would have just further damaged his career. No point in that fight continuing, he was getting badly hurt in there, and there was no way he was going to win, he couldn't land effectively and he was outclassed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    702
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    I agree that he was being dominated and in his head he already lost. When you start thinking you've lost, well it just becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Kudos to Ward. I would Rank him #1 p4p but I can't think of a reason to dethrone Mayweather.

    My Personal top 3 are

    Mayweather
    Martinez/Pac
    Ward
    Moreno(watch this guy in bantamweight. I swear he fight so reminiscent like Sweet Pete its eerie)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    I think that at the end of the day it's Dawson's career and Dawson's faculties. At least he is responsible, you could make a case for his corner pulling him out sooner. He was just mismatched in there, reminds me of Jermain Taylor in a way. Got talent, gifts etc but tactically, mentally there is nothing. Ward is a geat fight and I have been high on him for some time (wasn't always so I was won over at some point) but I can't put his win down to Ward being fantastic, I think he did a lot of things extremely well but Dawson also did a lot of things extremely badly.

    For example, how hard is it to at least compete for foot positioning, lead hand positioning etc? Not a rhetorical question but the assumption is that it is at least a blatantly observable disadvantage if your not even trying to establish anything Tactically he was fucken horrible. Ward usually switches up mid fight just to upset a guy's range a little.... To not have to do this against a bigger, longer and arguably more athletic guy (who I thought was very talented) like Dawson is a bit telling.
    Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 09-09-2012 at 07:46 PM.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,956
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5111
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    He was completely taken out of his depth and looked to be clueless. On the inside, outside you could literally see him wilt forward when caught clean late on. He clamored so hard to get that stage of career and had finally looked to turn the corner after Hopkins but at the end of the day he again coasted mentally, fell back into a preservation mode and when Ward read him like a book and started kicking in the door, it was either go out firing or quit with urgency. Only a man knows what he's willing or able to endure in the hopes of prevailing. I don't think it was Dawson 'choosing' what to do or not do, it was Ward taking it away physically and mentally. He opted out. He'll have to live with it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    He made the right decision. He must have known he had nothing left and absolutely no chance of winning.

    All he would have been doing by continuing was risking brain damage IMO.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,128
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Dawson have fought on?

    I thought Dawson was doing OK until the knock down in round 3 and then he was in survival mode and took a systematic beating. He did go 10 rounds so part of him must have wanted to see the final bell for his own pride. The weight was a factor and certainly weakened Dawson. Ward is not a big hitter but the constant pressure applied forced the stoppage.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 86
    Last Post: 06-28-2012, 07:11 PM
  2. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-22-2008, 01:16 PM
  3. If Hatton fought Pac Man
    By khan_no_1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 02:08 PM
  4. Who has fought the best competition?
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 08:57 AM
  5. What if VARGAS fought OSCAR BEFORE he fought TITO??????
    By TheBESTP4P in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-05-2007, 05:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing