Maybe USADA tests are too sensitive--better?--compared to other testing organizations.
I know we're not lab techs, but I wonder who's testing the testers? Is everyone on the same page, or are these testing orgs. in competition to see who can come up with the most sensitive tests?
We're all 100% behind anti-doping testing, but we want it to be unbiased and consistent.
Two questions, what purpose does voluntary random testing serve, if it can be ignored and who makes that decision?
Any answers or thoughts?