Thread: Who has Broner fought that Malignaggi wouldn't have beaten?

Really? Who has Broner actually fought to warrant all this hype?

Not one person picks Malignaggi to beat him. Except me!

Jump in 2 weights for this fight, but he hasn't fought anyone considered top at the previous weight, DeMarco at a push, and I think (quite obviously) that Malignaggi takes DeMarco just as easy as Broner did, maybe not on a KO though.

I don't get it, he hasn't out classed any top, top fighter in my opinion and the De Leon fight was very close.

Wilder gets bad hype because he hasn't fought a great deal of talent, yet Broner is the next Floyd, albeit he has fought some decent fighters, but not enough for me to consider him the next big thing.

While Broner is stepping up, considering how much he actually gets hit, do you think he'll stay up and take on a Mattyese or Canelo? Hardly.

youre probably right in sayng that malinagi would have had the same record as broner had he fought the same fighters as broner, and its down to size

and you have to consider it as if each fight was at welterweight as that is what the malinagi broner fight is at

@Vendettos, you're absolutely right in that Broner hasn't really been tested, and you're right that Paulie would have beaten all his foes, but Dawson would have beaten everyone Stevenson has faced and look what happened on Saturday. Paulie gets hit far too much for someone of his style and like I said in the other thread, he wasn't hard to find against Hatton. Broner is a wide lightweight, he's strong, he has decent pop and incredible speed. I just can't see Paulie staying away from this and landing enough over 12 rounds to take a decision. I'm not saying it is an easy fight, because Paulie can box and is tough as nails, but I think Broner will hand him a beating and I think he'll make it look easy too. Broner still deserves alot of credit if he wins this, it is a ballsy move to jump 2 weight divisions to take on a seasoned opponent.

my post a couple of posts up doesnt make a lot of sense does it? i hope you understood

I'm going with Paul myself. Paul always had a good chin and good skillset. He's not going to come staight in and he will or at least capable of jabbing for 12 rounds. Not to mention, he been up at this weight for 3 fights now.

I like Broner. But not sold on him yet. Because he took the lightest puncher possible makes me wonder. He could have stayed at 135 and fought a number of guys that would have tested him. Not to mention fighting at 140. The top 10 at 140 all would have tested Broner. He got star power, but not a resume' yet.

Paul by MD

Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD

It's not just about who you beat it's the way that you do it. Every other week fighters with inferior records on paper win, and they don't all start underdog, quite the contrary.

For sure Broner is a Grade 1 complete and utter cunt. However, you can't deny he hasn't got impressive skills and has been winning in style. Also Broner is 10 years younger than Paulie.

Originally Posted by Fenster

It's not just about who you beat it's the way that you do it. Every other week fighters with inferior records on paper win, and they don't all start underdog, quite the contrary.

For sure Broner is a Grade 1 complete and utter cunt. However, you can't deny he hasn't got impressive skills and has been winning in style. Also Broner is 10 years younger than Paulie.

But it's the level of talent he's beaten in style. He is good, no doubt, his skill set is pretty good, he's slick and has some power, but he hasn't fought anyone near worthy of making him the next Floyd.

I could hand pick guys with feather fists that I know are worse than me, and win in style, as could you.

Floyd fights guys that he could lose too, top class guys that have earned it. Never one time have I given a guy a chance against Broner, except Paulie.

P De Leon should have had the draw. I think Matthysse stops him inside 2 if Broner stays up and continues at this level and they ever meet. Broner isn't hard to hit, if Rees had a decent punch their fight would have been interesting because Rees hit him so many times in the first 3.

Well I'm certainly not calling him the "next Mayweather," but he does look very talented.

He is only 23. If he lives up to the hype, and shows the same talent up in class, I'm sure he'll have lots of big names on his record over the next few years.

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD

I'll argue this point. Paulie is quick, but Broner is quicker IMO. Also, Paulie isn't slick. He fights with a slick style, but he is far too easy to hit to be referred to as slick. He is tough, which is why he gets away with it, but Paulie is hardly a Mayweather. I'll happily sig bet this one if you want, but I see no way Paulie comes out with a win is this one. I just think Broner has the edge in speed, power and strength. Paulie has better footwork, but all the shit they've talked in the build up to this fight will mean he won't want to run as much.

Originally Posted by Fenster

Well I'm certainly not calling him the "next Mayweather," but he does look very talented.

He is only 23. If he lives up to the hype, and shows the same talent up in class, I'm sure he'll have lots of big names on his record over the next few years.

I have no doubt.

Look it's not that I don't like him, even if he is a proper bellend, I tend to ignore a boxers personal life, as I don't watch for the drama of his own issues.

That's why I can ignore Tyson being a rapist, or Valero being a murderer.

I just find it ridiculous that a forum full of boxing fans, are so 1 dimensional in thought processing. Nothing to me says that Broner is the favorite.

Originally Posted by bzkfn

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD

I'll argue this point. Paulie is quick, but Broner is quicker IMO. Also, Paulie isn't slick. He fights with a slick style, but he is far too easy to hit to be referred to as slick. He is tough, which is why he gets away with it, but Paulie is hardly a Mayweather. I'll happily sig bet this one if you want, but I see no way Paulie comes out with a win is this one. I just think Broner has the edge in speed, power and strength. Paulie has better footwork, but all the shit they've talked in the build up to this fight will mean he won't want to run as much.

You're on.

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Originally Posted by bzkfn

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD

I'll argue this point. Paulie is quick, but Broner is quicker IMO. Also, Paulie isn't slick. He fights with a slick style, but he is far too easy to hit to be referred to as slick. He is tough, which is why he gets away with it, but Paulie is hardly a Mayweather. I'll happily sig bet this one if you want, but I see no way Paulie comes out with a win is this one. I just think Broner has the edge in speed, power and strength. Paulie has better footwork, but all the shit they've talked in the build up to this fight will mean he won't want to run as much.

You're on.

brave man

its good to stick your neck out like that sometimes

One hope paulie has is that his size is a big advantage, i havent seen them stood next to each other so i dont know if there is any significant differrence, Paulie has fought big hitters in divisions north of broner tho so perhaps broners power wont be that significant

think what you like about gavin rees, he might not be top end world class but one thing is he is very tough, i havent ever seen him in any kind of trouble before appart from against kotelnik and in that fight he took so much punishment over 10 or 11 rounds or what ever it was he was just knackered, broner hurt him badly every time he made contact

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Originally Posted by Fenster

Well I'm certainly not calling him the "next Mayweather," but he does look very talented.

He is only 23. If he lives up to the hype, and shows the same talent up in class, I'm sure he'll have lots of big names on his record over the next few years.

I have no doubt.

Look it's not that I don't like him, even if he is a proper bellend, I tend to ignore a boxers personal life, as I don't watch for the drama of his own issues.

That's why I can ignore Tyson being a rapist, or Valero being a murderer.

I just find it ridiculous that a forum full of boxing fans, are so 1 dimensional in thought processing. Nothing to me says that Broner is the favorite.

Err... what? One dimensional thinking? The fight is between an unbeaten super talented 23-year-old, being groomed for stardom, against a powderpuff punching borderline veteran that has taken a sick beating everytime he's gone into "elite" level.

1. Paulie has zero chance of winning by KO.
2. Paulie has zero chance of getting it on the cards (even if it's close).
3. If Paulie had a chance the fight wouldn't even be happening. They are basically stealing a belt from the weakest title holder at 147.

If you think Paulie is the favourite, and you trust your judgement, you have the opportunity to win an absolute FORTUNE!!! Good luck mate.

Originally Posted by erics44

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Originally Posted by bzkfn

Originally Posted by Vendettos

Paulie is quick and slick, with a very fast jab, not farfetched that with Broners plod forward style that Paul can pick him off for 12 rounds.

Nothing he has done warrants the massive gap in favoritism I this fight.

Someone said 7/1 and nothing has me sold on Broner enough to make me even consider that as fair.

Paulie MD

I'll argue this point. Paulie is quick, but Broner is quicker IMO. Also, Paulie isn't slick. He fights with a slick style, but he is far too easy to hit to be referred to as slick. He is tough, which is why he gets away with it, but Paulie is hardly a Mayweather. I'll happily sig bet this one if you want, but I see no way Paulie comes out with a win is this one. I just think Broner has the edge in speed, power and strength. Paulie has better footwork, but all the shit they've talked in the build up to this fight will mean he won't want to run as much.

You're on.

brave man

its good to stick your neck out like that sometimes

One hope paulie has is that his size is a big advantage, i havent seen them stood next to each other so i dont know if there is any significant differrence, Paulie has fought big hitters in divisions north of broner tho so perhaps broners power wont be that significant

think what you like about gavin rees, he might not be top end world class but one thing is he is very tough, i havent ever seen him in any kind of trouble before appart from against kotelnik and in that fight he took so much punishment over 10 or 11 rounds or what ever it was he was just knackered, broner hurt him badly every time he made contact

Yeah people will say "Gavin Rees is shit" but he's never been outclassed like that. Broner made him look like a complete mug - which was down to Broner's class not Rees "shitness"