...its as stupid as saying that a 2013 salary for an accountant beats a 1956 salary for an accountant. Of course it does, because salaries have increased over time. And so has the size of heavyweights. So if we resurrect a 1956 accountant who was a Head Accountant and bring him to Wall Street today, its stupid to say "Oh, look! He's not making as much money as this accountant of today." Of course he's not.
Heavyweights in 1956 weighed 190 pounds roughly and stood 6 feet even. What sense is there in saying that someone that size could or could not fight the Klitschkos?
Makes about as much sense as saying that Sugar Ray Leonard could beat Larry Holmes.
Bookmarks