Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    ...its as stupid as saying that a 2013 salary for an accountant beats a 1956 salary for an accountant. Of course it does, because salaries have increased over time. And so has the size of heavyweights. So if we resurrect a 1956 accountant who was a Head Accountant and bring him to Wall Street today, its stupid to say "Oh, look! He's not making as much money as this accountant of today." Of course he's not.

    Heavyweights in 1956 weighed 190 pounds roughly and stood 6 feet even. What sense is there in saying that someone that size could or could not fight the Klitschkos?

    Makes about as much sense as saying that Sugar Ray Leonard could beat Larry Holmes.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1326
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    Well of course HW's have gotten bigger, but not exactly at the rate of inflation. There would need to be a 15 foot 1,000 pound HW champion for that to be a solid analogy these days lol. I do agree it's stupid to consider that fight though, Marciano was so much smaller than Klitschko and kind of depended on being at least physically comparable to his opponents. I tend to agree with Maxpower on this hypothetical

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    490
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    @brocktonblockbust, although I stated in the other thread that Wlad would beat Marciano, I do agree with you here that it makes little sense to compare the two. In fact, I think it's unfair to compare any 2 heavyweights separated by many generations because it's not really a fair comparison.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    True. Rocky was too small for even cruiserweight.

    If Rocky was around today, he'd most likely be cutting down to fight at 175.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    Really we should be asking how he would have done against guys like Bob Foster, Dariusz the Tiger, Roy Jones, Michael Spinks, ect.

    He has wins over 2 of the great LHW's in Archie Moore and Ezzard Charles.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    972
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    Rocky Marciano 5'10¾".

    KO'd 6' 5" Pat Connolly in 1 rd.
    KO'd 6' 4" Johnny Shkor in 6.
    KO'd 6' 4" Carmine Vingo in 6. Vingo was in a coma for days and never fought again.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2463
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Rocky Marciano 5'10¾".

    KO'd 6' 5" Pat Connolly in 1 rd.
    KO'd 6' 4" Johnny Shkor in 6.
    KO'd 6' 4" Carmine Vingo in 6. Vingo was in a coma for days and never fought again.
    Yes all true however , none of those would be HW champions in this era.
    Fact is Rocky was the best at his time , a long time ago.
    That is all you can ever be when no weight limit is in force.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1349
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    Rocky Marciano 5'10¾".

    KO'd 6' 5" Pat Connolly in 1 rd.
    KO'd 6' 4" Johnny Shkor in 6.
    KO'd 6' 4" Carmine Vingo in 6. Vingo was in a coma for days and never fought again.
    They had height, but I doubt they any real effective mass to them. Carmine was 189lbs so you're talking about a beanstalk there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Do people actually think Marciano would beat Ali?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-09-2012, 07:58 PM
  2. Why I am not afraid of the Klitschkos
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-11-2011, 10:20 PM
  3. The Klitschkos.... should be politicians really....
    By Hornfinger in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-22-2010, 02:19 PM
  4. How do you think Klitschkos would do in the MMA?
    By KingRome in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-02-2010, 05:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing