Thread: Sturm vs Mayweather at catchweight?

... anyone interested in seeing that?

No not really. Personally I don't see anything in that fight, I'd rather watch a Cotto rematch than Sturm.

Originally Posted by Manos de Piedra

No not really. Personally I don't see anything in that fight, I'd rather watch a Cotto rematch than Sturm.

Yea. I think a Cotto rematch would be better than Sturm. But Sturm looked pretty impressive against Barker. Sturm was also robbed by Oscar DLH. DLH took Maweather to a close split decision- unfortunately he lost to Mayweather.

I can see Sturm name dolloped in the Mayweather sweepstakes. Sweepstakes where the potential winners are becoming fewer and fewer.

Originally Posted by ykdadamaja

Originally Posted by Manos de Piedra

No not really. Personally I don't see anything in that fight, I'd rather watch a Cotto rematch than Sturm.

Yea. I think a Cotto rematch would be better than Sturm. But Sturm looked pretty impressive against Barker. Sturm was also robbed by Oscar DLH. DLH took Maweather to a close split decision- unfortunately he lost to Mayweather.

I can see Sturm name dolloped in the Mayweather sweepstakes. Sweepstakes where the potential winners are becoming fewer and fewer.

Yeah it was a split decision just like Canelo fight was a majority decision lol. They were both easy wins for Mayweather and should have been UDs.
Sturm wasn't that impressive against Barker IMO. I felt that Barker was doing well and was in the fight until his hip gave way. He would have made it a tough fight for Sturm and might have gone on to win.

Catch weight is such bull shit and a complete waste of time. Just gives every advantage to Mayweather who is already the far superior fighter. He should stop bitching around and fight at middle weight if he wants to fight middleweights