When talking about rankings let's just take the heavyweight all time great rankings. Everybody pretty much puts the same 10 guys in the top 10 give or take two or three. For example Joe Frazier is one of those fighters that some people have and others do not have in their top 10 ranking. Evander Holyfield is another one which I have seen in and out of the top 10 rankings. So I think it's safe to say that the top 15 or even the top 20 all-time great heavyweights IS a relevant number but the question is:
beyond the top 20, how many more spots in the rankings are really relevant? For example is the number 40th all time great heavyweight a significant ranking or does it become insignificant after about 25 or 30 in your opinion?
Muhammad Ali and Larry Holmes and Joe Louis and Jack Johnson and Rocky Marciano and Lennox Lewis and George Foreman are undoubtedly in most people's top 7 all-time great heavyweights would you not agree? Then we come to guys like Evander Holyfield and Mike Tyson and Joe Frazier and Jack Dempsey and Wladimir Klitschko and Sonny Liston who seemed to be in the next category of rankings. This brings us to about 14 fighters. Beyond them I think a lot of people have Ken Norton and Gene Tunney and Max Schmeling and Floyd Patterson and for example Ezzard Charles or Jersey Joe Walcott or Riddick Bowe in the third grouping. This gives us about 22 fighters or so.
But are the next 15 or 20 fighters so vaguely ranked that for example the number 33 spot or the number 39 spot become impossible to determine or irrelevant?
Bookmarks