Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    When talking about rankings let's just take the heavyweight all time great rankings. Everybody pretty much puts the same 10 guys in the top 10 give or take two or three. For example Joe Frazier is one of those fighters that some people have and others do not have in their top 10 ranking. Evander Holyfield is another one which I have seen in and out of the top 10 rankings. So I think it's safe to say that the top 15 or even the top 20 all-time great heavyweights IS a relevant number but the question is:

    beyond the top 20, how many more spots in the rankings are really relevant? For example is the number 40th all time great heavyweight a significant ranking or does it become insignificant after about 25 or 30 in your opinion?

    Muhammad Ali and Larry Holmes and Joe Louis and Jack Johnson and Rocky Marciano and Lennox Lewis and George Foreman are undoubtedly in most people's top 7 all-time great heavyweights would you not agree? Then we come to guys like Evander Holyfield and Mike Tyson and Joe Frazier and Jack Dempsey and Wladimir Klitschko and Sonny Liston who seemed to be in the next category of rankings. This brings us to about 14 fighters. Beyond them I think a lot of people have Ken Norton and Gene Tunney and Max Schmeling and Floyd Patterson and for example Ezzard Charles or Jersey Joe Walcott or Riddick Bowe in the third grouping. This gives us about 22 fighters or so.

    But are the next 15 or 20 fighters so vaguely ranked that for example the number 33 spot or the number 39 spot become impossible to determine or irrelevant?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    679
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    50 is cool when there is a segment on television talking all time greats.

    Its isn't cool when having a table discussion, or sitting at the barber shop having the sports discussion waiting to get your haircut.
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    771
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Yes. I'm not a real boxing history buff, so after 15 or 20 it starts feeling like work to me.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    OK LETS DO THIS:

    everybody name 10 VERY GOOD/GREAT fighters who do NOT belong in the Top 20

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Good question. No it doesn't matter where you are ranked as no list will ever be definitive. Just being mentioned as an all-time great should be enough. I can't even name 50 heavyweights without boxrec, so I guess 33 or 39 is utterly irrelevant.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Here's my top heavyweights. I don't think i've left out many all-time greats, if I have these guys would batter them anyway.

    1. Lennox Lewis
    2. Muhammad Ali
    3. Evander Holyfield
    4. George Foreman
    5. Mike Tyson
    6. Joe Frazier
    7. Vitali Klitschko
    8. Jack Dempsey
    9. Riddick Bowe
    10. Earnie Shavers
    11. Wlad Klitschko
    12. Joe Louis
    13. Larry Holmes
    14. Sonny Liston
    15. Gary Mason
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,048
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2251
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Gary Mason . What happened there? Could you only really think of 14?
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Do an all time top ten of greatest heavyweights based on their career achievments then,musing the same fghters do a top ten on who would get the most wns if they were to all fight each other.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,048
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2251
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    OK LETS DO THIS:

    everybody name 10 VERY GOOD/GREAT fighters who do NOT belong in the Top 20
    How's this for a starter for ten,

    Gene Tunney
    Pinklon Thomas
    Gentleman Jim Corbett
    Max Baer
    James J Jeffries
    Ingemar Johansson
    Max Schmeling
    Jersey Joe Walcott
    Jake Kilrain
    Bob Fitzimmons
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    I was going to put Herbie Hide on my list but after deep deliberation went for Mason as, a hundred years ago, whilst sitting in a traffic jam in his mini, he waved and gave a "alright boys" to me me and my mate when we shouted "Gary"
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,124
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Yes it is top 20 at most and Herbie Hide and Gary Mason are not in it. Neither is Bruno.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    So let me get this straight. You would not even put Rocky Marciano in the top 20?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,124
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    So let me get this straight. You would not even put Rocky Marciano in the top 20?
    Of course he would be.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    679
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you consider the Top 50 to be too many?

    1. Jack Johnson
    *2. Clay Ali 64-67 version
    3. Lennox Lewis
    4. James Jeffries
    5. Gene Tunney
    6. Joe Louis
    7. Jack Dempsey
    8. Larry Holmes
    9. Rocky Marciano
    10 Evander Holyfield
    *11 Ali (Post1970)
    12. Mike Tyson
    13. Bob Fitzsimmons
    14. George Forman
    15. Vitali Klitchko
    16. Jersey Joe Walcott
    17. Sam Langford
    18. Riddick Bowe
    19. Ezzard Charles
    20. Joe Frazier
    21. Wladimir Klitchko
    22. Jim Corbett
    23. Sonny Liston
    24. Tim Witherspoon
    25. Archie Moore
    26. Cleveland Williams
    27 Max Schmelling
    28. Sam McVey
    29. Tommy Burns
    30. Ernie Shavers
    31. Floyd Patterson
    32. Jimmy Ellis
    33.Joe Jeannette
    34. max Baer
    35. Tommy Farr
    36. Jimmy Braddock
    37 Primo Carnera
    37. Young Stribling
    38. Pinklon Thomas
    39. Ken Norton
    40 Michael Moorer
    41. Ray Mercer
    42. George Chuvalo
    43. Jerry Quarry
    44. Ron Lyle
    45. Sam Peter
    46. David Tua
    47 Hasim Rahman
    48 Oleg Maskaev
    49 Eddie Machen
    50. James Toney (beat Holyfield- Bullshit reversal against Ruiz, bad decision 1st Peter fight)


    That took a while to do....
    All's lost! Everything's going to shit!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing