Just finished watching the Benavidez-Santana fight prior to the Crawford-Postol main event.
Let's face it... lousy judging has always been a part of boxing. But it is just purely worthless now? I mean WHAT THE HELL... MAN. 100-90 in favor of Benavidez?? That's not just a lousy score. It's a slap in the face to a gallant effort by Santana, who clearly won several rounds. It's also a slap in the face to all boxing fans, as you could just pull a drunk patron from a nearby bar and he'd probably put in a better score. Just how long are we going to put up with this type of shit?? It ruins our wonderful sport.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes:
Reply With Quote


I mean all three score are very individual but in many cases you have one where the judge was clearly busy over at the casino bar or in need of paying some bills
. Its almost an unfortunate time honored tradition to have blind judges either one at a time or as a whole. The obvious glaring problem with terrible judging is that there is almost always ZERO accountability, review or reprimand on a judge who cannot differentiate rounds. Judges are exactly like fighters in that they accumulate a record of performance and they need to be scrutinized as such before just being appointed. Know the names, make them stand ring center being introduced or even have them read it aloud at end. They stay in the shadows and that has to make it even easier to be blind or worse. We need a Teddy at every table to literally hold the score sheet in the face of a judge and commissioner and make them admit they were wrong on live tv. Again.



Bookmarks