The FBI used images of the servers which were provided to them....let me state that again for you since you believe I'm the dense one...which were provided to them. Now Kirkland, let's say just for a hypothetical situation let's say your apartment was broken into and your security camera caught everything on tape would the FBI just accept your record of that OR would the FBI take the information directly from the system? If the FBI is doing their job CORRECTLY then they'd access the tape/file/etc without it changing hands or even possibly being manipulated.
Allow me to be charitable and let one James Comey explain via a CNN article...you trust both Comey and CNN don't you Kirkland?
Comey said the FBI would have preferred to "get access to the original device or server" that was the target of hacking at the DNC. CNN previously reported that the Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election.
The FBI instead relied on the assessment of a third-party security company called CrowdStrIke. Comey told senators that the "highly respected private company eventually got access and shared" the evidence with the FBI.
Hmmm "would have preferred" What? "to gain access to the original device or server" Why is that? DNC "rebuffed" an FBI request WHAAAAAAT "EVENTUALLY" got access? After how long? Why the wait? Why the "rebuff"? I mean if no funny business is going on why could the FBI (under PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S WATCH mind you) not get access to that material? Surely HRC didn't fear Obama meddling in the election did she? Also looking at that one must wonder why Hillary Clinton was given so much leeway to delete emails bash up phones and NOT hand over subpoenaed materials all of which is extremely illegal and if you ever did that to the FBI I doubt things would go all that well for you, but hey give it a whirl and see what happens to you.
Well see the RNC was willing to work with the FBI and hand over what they needed once they got informed of cyber attacks on their servers. No fucking around, no deferring to Crowdstrike, no monkey business, and therefore no problem or at the very least no reason to think there's a problem. Meanwhile you look the other direction with the obstruction and obfuscation and delaying and denying and yyyyeah it kinda starts looking like there's a little bit of something the DNC ain't too fond of sharing and I for one want to know what THAT is ...but that's me I guess I'm just curious
You don't think a "Mega Corporation" cares about who gets elected? Then why do they lobby so much if they don't care? You don't think cyber access to the United States Democrat Party is a big fucking deal? Yeah I'm sure they worked with Republicans too a lot of Republicans are crooked as shit too.
Most Americans know that the law works very simply innocent until proven guilty, reasonable doubt, etc. It is (and yes this is witch trial stuff) not the practice of the court to have the accused presumed guilty and innocence is what is searched for....that is Spanish Inquisition, Gulag Archipelago, Kangaroo Court, Banana Republic bullshit right there and Robert Mueller knows that full fucking well too. So when Mueller says "If we had had confidence that the president had clearly not committed a crime we would have said so" he's perverting how the court actually runs in America and it sets a bad precedent for future issues should any arise it's certainly why President Trump says "This should never happen to another President ever again".
But hey you hate me you hate Trump and your hate has clouded your mind. I hate Hillary Clinton, and I want her to rot in prison for various things she has done, but I'm waiting for her to actually get what is coming to her and NO I wouldn't feel great if she was railroaded by the FBI even though it's what she wanted to do to her opponents.