3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
The reason people are poor is because of the "hundreth monkey effect." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundredth_monkey_effect)
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
And yes, your post above this is correct. People typically mix with their own groups and if the groups are going to pass on negative characteristics and attitudes, then that is what you get. You get people like me, Brock and Tommy Robinson who do mix with others, but many do not do that. Up to them at the end of the day, but if you are going to bring in millions of people and require no integration then good luck with that experiment!
Barrack Obama: "More than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled — doubled — since we were children."
Barrack Obama: "children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."
If Obama gets it, then I am sure you can too Einstein.
For you, only you are prudent and hard working, and poor black people get what they deserve. This is what your racist arse is saying when you repeat the racist lie from your racist brain that Black people are poor because they choose to be poor.
You second sentence -
"You cannot be anything but poor if you have no Dad and a Mother who does not work or works but struggles"
Is another lie that does nothing but reveal the depth of your wilful stupidity.
The greatest thing about the whole lesson is how ape like the people who rely on inventing data to get their fleas picked are exposed as being.
" The number of monkeys in the colony was counted as 59 in 1962 indicating that even in numbers no "hundredth monkey" existed."
Also, if I choose not to work or to not upgrade my skills or live on benefits then I too am CHOOSING poverty. Many people do and this is life whence inequality. Some people really do not have in them, do not want to try, and if possible will opt out. They will live in poverty. What really irks me though is people having children as a means of securing resources. That borders on the criminal IMO and is a form of hostage taking.
What is untrue about my 'second sentence'? People raised in single parent households will inevitably consume more resources of responsible people who do the right things and still live in relative poverty. It is unfair on the child and unfair on society and it is actively promoted as seen in a recent BBC documentary.
Many people work hard and make good decisions and many do not whence some of the inequality in society which is natural and normal and dare I say good.
Gandalf you said
"Black people are poor because they generally choose to be poor"
It is an indefensible statement. It is just another example of the normalisation of racism. It is yet another example of your wheeling out a bigoted trope born of ignorance. That ignorance is born out of your own personality. You are not alone, fundamental attribution erroris very common.
It is a choice to put children through this. It is a choice to get pregnant to men who will not stand by you. It is a choice to not give all your children the advantages that other children with two loving parents will have. Now you can dress it up and shout racism from the rooftops as much as you like, but in many of these cases black people are choosing poverty. There is no racism holding anybody back, everybody has the same freedom to become a doctor, or lawyer, or truck driver. However, what I will argue is that without correct nurturing, love and guidance, you might not even think to become a doctor. So not only is there financial poverty, but there is nurturing poverty. It is a choice not to nurture your child. It is choice to raise your child in the least advantageous way possible.
Is society really holding people back or is it more likely that people tend to be holding themselves back or maybe some just do not have the ability or even the drive to achieve. State by state, there is a pattern and they are either choosing it or else it is being forced on them. Take your pick.
@Miles, answer Denilson's pertinent question? How does it affect you? Why do you care so much about "degenerate" black mums and dads?
There are zero black people in South Korea? (ignoring the privileged blacks)
Last edited by Fenster; 06-21-2019 at 02:21 AM.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
OK. Your words not mine.
Barack Obama. Right ?
Say what you want about his policies and his presidency the fact is ?
There was not 1% of personal scandal him at all.
He had no kids out of wedlock. He didn't sag his pants. He did smoke blunts.
Yet did the white supremacists say "Hey !! Wait a minute !! This Barack Obama has no kids out of wedlock. He's a good father to his kids. He not committing any crime. I think we should lay off him"
No. He got the n*gger treatment just like any other black person.
They used to lynch black people in suits. In fact most of the black people lynched and hung were black business owners. They were acting a little bit uppity and didn't know their place
In fact let's go deeper.
Rosewood in the early part of the last century ?
A thriving black community living independent of whites was burned to the ground by white supremacists.
Not 2 mention Bruce’s Beach, Black Wall Street, Bronzeville in Chicago and Black Baltimore during the days of sailing ships all show a pattern of White officials making extraordinary efforts to cut black business development off at the knees.
Black degradation is essential 2 White supremacists.
Thriving Black business districts and countries and strong Black communities would expose the lie at the heart of White Supremacy ideology.
The Tulsa Riot in the early part of the last century.
Same again. Thriving black community. Blew up by white ppl with the aid of the US government.
Growth of ones own country can't happen in isolation. It has to be within an agreed shared global structure which includes everyone. While the ideology and controlling structure of white supremacy remains firmly in place, restrictions will ultimately always apply to black nations.
Its no different to slaves growing their own independent business on the plantation. Sooner or later if its successful the master will want a cut of any of the profits or control of it. Eventually either dominating it completely, eliminating it to avoid unfavorable competition or even having it challenge the plantation slave institution itself.
One only has to look at the likes of Colonel Gaddifi who was trying to create a central african bank and an african communication network in Africa. Africa is a massive source for mobile phone networks and internet. Africans make billions for the white supremacists. Gaddifi plan went against there wishes just as would have an African bank. So he had to be killed
Patrice Lumumba, one of the greatest black leaders to emerge in this century, was assinated by the Belgians with the aid of US, so that the white international community could get the puppet government that they wanted in the Congo.
What you are clumsily trying to do is shift the blame of racism on to black people.
I get it
You're trying to move argument is moved from what white supremacists do to what you think black ppl do. It's just a cheap attempt to change the subject, to draw attention away from what white supremacists do. But at a deeper level it is also a moral argument – directed not at black ppl but at yourself.
Whites knows they live in an unequal society where whites benefit and blacks get screwed.
You have a choice.
1) Fight against that inequality
2) Make up excuses.
Making up excuses is way easier.
So that's were your "out of wedlock kids" etc arguments come from because if you can blame blacks, then you have no reason to feel guilty at all. You can still see yourself as a good person. Case closed!
So in the end we know all about what is wrong with blacks, because that makes white people feel better about themselves, but very little is said about what is wrong with white people and the white racism built into society.
Last edited by Denilson-The-Comeback; 06-21-2019 at 03:02 AM.
I guess it boils down to me hating to see children wayward, lost, abandoned, stifled and harmed. It is not absolute of course and there are many exceptions but the facts are what they are and I simply think people should either take parenting seriously or don't do it at all. If we cannot even accept that single mother rates are a leading cause of poverty in the community then there can be no progress. I want better for kids and it starts with responsible parenting. If you are a bit mad like me then don't do it!
I will reply to that later Denilson. However, I see from the off you have misreprented what I said.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)