Thread: Teddy Atlas on WBC's treatment of Dillian Whyte!

About time someone said something in the open. Whyte should have fought Wilder months ago... This Ortiz fight for Wilder is not needed.

I think would actually be a good fight. Whyte is dangerous for Wilder I think, he's a dangerous underdog.

Cant watch right now, and I dont know exactly the details as to why it didnt happen, but Whyte vs Ortiz was either in talks or ordered by the WBC months and months ago. That would have been a very interesting fight. Agreed Wilder vs Ortiz isnt needed, but would anyone be totally shocked by an upset there either i guess its unlikely now that Ortiz is even older, but he probably would have won the first fight with a fair ref, if we are being honest.

It probably should be Wilder v Whyte not Ortiz but as Ron has said many times just because you are the number one contender does not mean you are the mandatory if you do not fight your eliminator.

Whyte is content in his role, making his money, gaining much needed experience and slowly fighting more dangerous opponents. It has worked for him and good luck to him but he is far from a victim.

I don't think Eddie holds much sway with the WBC not like Mr King used to.!

For the hundredth time Whyte was not the mandatory because he refused his eliminators 3 times!

Drug cheat cried his way into the WBC allowing him to pick his eliminator opponent which is unfair in his favor, he drug cheats again.

The video is of a misinformed man on a misinformed rant. Anyone agreeing with him is also misinformed because logic