Thread: 1973 George Foreman vs 1942 Joe Louis

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Wait a minute! @joe smith has been banned? For what? Being a WUM?
If so, there’s one or two on here that need to watch out!
The rest of you should be banned for being daft enough to waste your time debating with the dopey fucker!

Primo is up on all these acronyms what the hell is a w u m

Not really my man. “Wind up Merchant”
Are you sure you’ve never come across this before?

Lol coming across it and being guilty of it are two different things lol

Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Wait a minute! @joe smith has been banned? For what? Being a WUM?
If so, there’s one or two on here that need to watch out!
The rest of you should be banned for being daft enough to waste your time debating with the dopey fucker!

Primo is up on all these acronyms what the hell is a w u m

Not really my man. “Wind up Merchant”
Are you sure you’ve never come across this before?

Lol coming across it and being guilty of it are two different things lol

Very true.

Originally Posted by Denilson3.0

@joe smith

Took me hours to write that you sonofB.

I was up till the early hours. All that work and I just checked your previous posts and realized you've been banned.



I mean I'm pretty sure you're still lurking here. But man. What did you do ? O sh*t you can't respond you've been banned (lol)

​My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to a lot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era



if you can make the louis era more advanced than video shows go ahead, looks horrible i wont act like i don't see them as that,you or no one else can make me see them as advanced, you're not sane like the rest like you on here

Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell

And finally I have to completely disagree that Joe Louis beats George Foreman there is absolutely no way that can happen look at 42 year old George Foreman how he stood for 12 rounds against a prime a Vander Holyfield who was hitting him point blank on the chin with full Force rocking Foreman all around with 15 or 20 punch combinations...I really don't think Joe could take out a prime George foreman in that case

He might hurt him or rock him a bit but big George former will just slowly find the Mark and club him to death

Joe did not fight like Muhammad Ali in any sense so Foreman would eventually club Joe out

​My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Well, let's see...

You come in new. You flood the boards with fanatical material which seems cut/pasted from post to post. You begin slinging insults en masse (remember... you're new... the leeway is slightly less). You include moderators in your insults. Rather than engage in what would normally be considered normal debate, you just regurgitate the same stuff over and over and over again.

I'm not saying those are necessarily capital offenses.
But you can usually expect the Welcome mat to be retracted at some point in time.

This place gets more than its share of spammers... so the "probationary period" can sometimes be a little short.

Basically, have your fun and all, repost same incoherent vid and response 10,12 times but restarting same spam fest first thing next day is just exceeding a cunty quota tbh. Troll for a reaction and you shall receive.

Ironically I'm sure he's not the only Joe Louis hater in boxing fandom. Had he gone about it differently... who knows... we're all up for healthy boxing debates.

​My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Wait a minute! @joe smith has been banned? For what? Being a WUM?
If so, there’s one or two on here that need to watch out!
The rest of you should be banned for being daft enough to waste your time debating with the dopey fucker!

My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

exposed yourself for not being sane like the rest

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Well, let's see...

You come in new. You flood the boards with fanatical material which seems cut/pasted from post to post. You begin slinging insults en masse (remember... you're new... the leeway is slightly less). You include moderators in your insults. Rather than engage in what would normally be considered normal debate, you just regurgitate the same stuff over and over and over again.

I'm not saying those are necessarily capital offenses.
But you can usually expect the Welcome mat to be retracted at some point in time.

This place gets more than its share of spammers... so the "probationary period" can sometimes be a little short.

Not here for any debating mission is to spread the truth on video, you for a fact can't make the louis era more advanced than video shows,you're not sane like the rest here acting like you can alter video, they look like novices like my video shows

I'll keep spreading the truth

If you are not here for debating then you are in the wrong place.

Originally Posted by Master

If you are not here for debating then you are in the wrong place.

mission is to spread the truth on video, you for a fact can't make the louis era more advanced than video shows,you're not sane like the rest here acting like you can alter video, they look like novices like my video shows

I'll keep spreading the truth I'll be on other sites spreading the truth to,does that hurt, I'm already on 2 tube and another place and I'll be joining more,I'm ascended

Originally Posted by joe smith

Originally Posted by Master

If you are not here for debating then you are in the wrong place.

mission is to spread the truth on video, you for a fact can't make the louis era more advanced than video shows,you're not sane like the rest here acting like you can alter video, they look like novices like my video shows

I'll keep spreading the truth I'll be on other sites spreading the truth to,does that hurt, I'm already on 2 tube and another place and I'll be joining more,I'm ascended

Nice to see you back, but more importantly, nice to see your cut and paste still works! 👍

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by joe smith

Originally Posted by Master

If you are not here for debating then you are in the wrong place.

mission is to spread the truth on video, you for a fact can't make the louis era more advanced than video shows,you're not sane like the rest here acting like you can alter video, they look like novices like my video shows

I'll keep spreading the truth I'll be on other sites spreading the truth to,does that hurt, I'm already on 2 tube and another place and I'll be joining more, I'm ascended

Nice to see you back, but more importantly, nice to see your cut and paste still works! 👍

Nice to see you're still not sane cant see good like the rest like you here,and can't alter the louis era to be more advanced than video shows

Be tough to beat Marciano in ANY era. Guy wouldn't stop. Stronger round by round....fresher in the 15th than the 1st.

Originally Posted by joe smith

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by joe smith

Originally Posted by Master

If you are not here for debating then you are in the wrong place.

mission is to spread the truth on video, you for a fact can't make the louis era more advanced than video shows,you're not sane like the rest here acting like you can alter video, they look like novices like my video shows

I'll keep spreading the truth I'll be on other sites spreading the truth to,does that hurt, I'm already on 2 tube and another place and I'll be joining more, I'm ascended

Nice to see you back, but more importantly, nice to see your cut and paste still works! 👍

Nice to see you're still not sane cant see good like the rest like you here,and can't alter the louis era to be more advanced than video shows

Why am I not sane ? I have not disputed or debated any of the points you made. (Actually, when I say “any”, it’s the same point cut and pasted a million times!)
To be honest, I have so little interest in your posts that I haven’t read them sufficiently to make a comment one way or another.
All I will say , and it is an undeniable FACT , is that you have a lazy style of posting that just regurgitates the same drivel time after time not making any point to back up your opinion and counter anybody’s to the contrary.
That’s why people get pissed off with it and think you’re a Dopey fucker!
So to summarise, congratulations! You’ve even got me to waste 5 minutes of my life replying to you.👍

Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell

Be tough to beat Marciano in ANY era. Guy wouldn't stop. Stronger round by round....fresher in the 15th than the 1st.

My video shows exactly how Joe and his era fought. In that video, does that version of Joe look like he or anybody else would land anything on foreman or people he fought?

he and guys from his time look like novices compared side by side to no names Foreman fought, and in no way does anyone from that era look like they would last 1 round vs. guys in the 70s-'90s

The video clearly shows his whole era were novice like compared in angles/tech/fluidity/timing/defense and they fought really dumb to alot of times standing right in front of the opposition and waiting for them to counter or to hit them, i specifically chose no names to show even those guys were way more advanced than the whole louis era

exposed yourself for not being sane like the rest

Oh you meant the fictional rock from highlights? My mistake