Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    Barry Mcguigan

    FULL marks to Dennis Hobson and Frank Warren, the respective promoters of IBF light heavyweight champion Clinton Woods and WBO and IBF super middleweight champion Joe Calzaghe.

    The pair returned to the playground this week to trade insults and lay odds on the respective chances of their fighters should a date be agreed this summer.

    And more importantly, to drum up interest, not in the UK, but America.

    Allow me to introduce some clarity into the debate. The fight is a bigger deal for Woods than Calzaghe.

    After his victory over Jeff Lacy, Calzaghe is a name respected on both sides of the pond, a bona fide world beater.

    For Woods, unfortunately, it is still a matter of Clinton who? Oh, the Limey who lost to Roy Jones Jnr and Glen Johnson. Harsh but true across the Atlantic.

    While it makes obvious sense for Woods to pursue the Welsh superstar, Calzaghe would be far better off chasing a showdown with Jones, whose name retains some of the kudos from his halcyon days.

    Failing that Antonio Tarver, the linear champion and a fighter regarded as the best light-heavyweight in the world, would better enhance Calzaghe's CV.

    Or what about Bernard Hopkins? It is a fight Warren has tried to make for Joe in the past.

    Despite the narrow defeats to Jermaine Taylor at middleweight, there is enough left in the Hopkins legend to merit a clash. And he would not have to fry himself to make the middleweight limit. Hopkins, Jones, Tarver and Calzaghe all have what Woods does not, stardust in the eyes of American broadcasters.

    There is another reason why Calzaghe would be advised to give Woods a wide berth. It's a hard fight. Tougher than Jones, certainly.

    Clinton has campaigned at the weight for some time now. For Calzaghe it would be a step up into the unknown.

    I'd fancy him to win it, but it probably would not be pretty and worse still, of little interest to viewers in the United States.

    I can see why Warren is pursuing this route. He thinks the best way to snare the golden geese of the light-heavyweight division is with a title. Woods' IBF version to be exact. I think Calzaghe has done enough already.

    A £120,000 fine and a year's ban was bang on for Roger Mayweather, trainer and uncle of Floyd, for his part in the Las Vegas melee last week

    Whatever the wrong perpetrated by the outgunned Zab Judah, who in desperation hit Mayweather low then followed that up with a rabbit punch, uncle Roger was not justified in crossing the ropes in pursuit of retribution.

    A week on the episode has acquired a comic tone, but in the heat of battle it could not have been more serious.

    Had Roger injured Judah when he had him by the throat, there would have been no way back for him.

    There have been many similar cameos in recent years. My all-time favourite is the thrashing handed out by Tony Wilson's mother Milna, who got stuck into his opponent Steve McCarthy with her shoe because her boy was taking a beating.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    i want calzaghe toi unify the division and only then step up for a couple of fights at light heavy weight....

    i dont think its going to go how i would like though...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    I'm with you, I want unification, but he's let Beyer keep his belt for like 7 years so we've no reason to believe he's going to do any unifying now (please, noone point out Lacy, Jeff called him out AND went to Manchester to get that fight made and I don't see Beyer or Kessler sporting balls that big).
    Anyway, if he won't unify the division I'd like to see a fight with Tarver.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1602
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    Quote Originally Posted by miles
    i want calzaghe toi unify the division and only then step up for a couple of fights at light heavy weight....

    i dont think its going to go how i would like though...
    Quote Originally Posted by FLH2o
    I'm with you, I want unification, but he's let Beyer keep his belt for like 7 years so we've no reason to believe he's going to do any unifying now (please, noone point out Lacy, Jeff called him out AND went to Manchester to get that fight made and I don't see Beyer or Kessler sporting balls that big).
    Anyway, if he won't unify the division I'd like to see a fight with Tarver.
    Agreed with you both.
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    Well I'm glad Barry cleared that up. Calzaghe should fight Hopkins, Jones or Tarver cause Woods aint a big name

    I reckon he's on to something here


    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: woods path is wrong for calzaghe

    Woods is too much of a risk for little reward

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing