Frankly.. There is no arguement to say Hatton hasnt got a claim to P4P stature if Calzaghe is considered In the P4P Rankings..

Both Undefeated..Both 40 odd/+ fights...

But yes Calzaghe is always under scrutiny for his level of opposition.. Hatton is at times.. More so for his performances against Fair competition imo

But if calzaghe is considered P4P ..Then hatton should be higher.. Because theres no arguement to say that joe has faced better opposition.. The only thing that could be brought up is Joe's long title reign..

And that to me is a con not a pro.. Joe still doesnt match up to hatton even whilst remaining a long reigning world champion..

To me it puts hatton all the higher for bieng willing to drop these titles for the sake of legacy and entertaining fights..

But.. Lets have this out in the open and see how people feel for it..

Personally.. I havent said Calzaghe is P4P.. I perhaps consider Ricky just inside the top ten perhaps just outside of it..

But if joe is universally considered a p4p contender then ricky should be more so

Lets get it on..
Remember guys im fair but im firm .. Lol