Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    2,658
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1509
    Cool Clicks

    Default Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    In all seriousness, I think that there is a chance that the judge who scored this fight for Navarro 120-108 may not have known which boxer was which.

    That is giving him the benefit of the doubt, because if he did know who was who, then he was paid off. No ifs, no buts, no maybes - that guy is either one stupid or one corrupt motherfucker.
    "I take good care of my people. I like to inflict permanent psychological damage."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    961
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    i say both...=)
    mind over speed and power

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2842
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    I wish he would consult with me before such things. I could pull a Welshdevil rob with my pics if I had a judge that malleable.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    919
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    In all seriousness, I think that there is a chance that the judge who scored this fight for Navarro 120-108 may not have known which boxer was which.

    That is giving him the benefit of the doubt, because if he did know who was who, then he was paid off. No ifs, no buts, no maybes - that guy is either one stupid or one corrupt motherfucker.
    It's funny, because about halfway through the fight I realized I still didn't know which guy was which and I said so to my girl. Merchant got them mixed up about a half-dozen times too, although that's actually not uncommmon.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2842
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by uptoscratch View Post
    It's funny, because about halfway through the fight I realized I still didn't know which guy was which and I said so to my girl. Merchant got them mixed up about a half-dozen times too, although that's actually not uncommmon.

    Just because you and a drunk senile commentator get a fighter mixed up, that doesn't give the judges that excuse.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    919
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post
    Just because you and a drunk senile commentator get a fighter mixed up, that doesn't give the judges that excuse.
    Heh, yeah, but it makes Larry look better -- at least he knew who was who by the end of the fight, and he's drunk and senile.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hunter Valley, NSW Australia
    Posts
    1,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1246
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    In all seriousness, I think that there is a chance that the judge who scored this fight for Navarro 120-108 may not have known which boxer was which.

    That is giving him the benefit of the doubt, because if he did know who was who, then he was paid off. No ifs, no buts, no maybes - that guy is either one stupid or one corrupt motherfucker.
    Wow that is strange. But you know it's Vegas, what are you gunna do?
    “If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize.” Muhammad Ali.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by bikersk View Post
    Wow that is strange. But you know it's Vegas, what are you gunna do?
    Yeah there should be some kind of investigation into that nonsense....check who put big money on a split decision... I am almost tempted to start my own list of questionable calls and compare the culprits see if there repeat offenders...but theres no way I have that kind of access to every scorecard and every fight. Would be interesting though. They need a system like the NFL has where they review the officials calls and the good guys get into playoffs/super bowl the bad guys get let go/reprimanded.
    Last edited by No Contest; 02-17-2008 at 08:09 PM. Reason: add-on ranting

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    thanks swice have some rep

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    644
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by Baby-Faced-Assassin View Post
    thanks swice have some rep
    No problem. Rep returned.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    644
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Even if that is the case, that score still wouldn't make sense.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1202
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    120-108 for Navarro was without doubt the worst bit of judging i have ever seen. This takes the biscuit, there is no comparison Doug Tucker is one dumb mother......! The fight was competitive but unless he did get confused as to who was who you wouldn't have it a shutout for Mijares either. This was just total incompetence! Now can we get Mijares V Montiel happening? Vic retire now!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1283
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    I wonder if a fighter has ever won a split decision, while losing 12-0 on one card. This might be a first.

    Doug Tucker is a moron. He also had Marquez beating Barrera 10-2 and Griffin beating Toney 11-1.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    How can there be any excuse about not knowing who was who. Navarro had his name on the back of his shorts. I noticed that after watching for barely 30 seconds.

    Shocking and it cost me in the prediction contest as I plugged for the UD.
    Tip of the month: Protect yourselves at all times. You never know when the scheming bitch will come back for more.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1202
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Only in boxing - Mijares/Navarro

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    I wonder if a fighter has ever won a split decision, while losing 12-0 on one card. This might be a first.

    Doug Tucker is a moron. He also had Marquez beating Barrera 10-2 and Griffin beating Toney 11-1.
    Well there you go, total incompetence. They must surely investigate how this dickhead judges fights. Buffer looked like he didn't want to read it out!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-05-2008, 01:48 AM
  2. Navarro v Kirilov on October 15th
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-31-2007, 05:37 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-12-2007, 09:16 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 03:53 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 10:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing