Thread: Joe Calzaghe???????

45-0 And what come on fill me in tell me what i'm missing after years of watching i still think he is CRAP!!

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

45-0 And what come on fill me in tell me what i'm missing after years of watching i still think he is CRAP!!

me too.

Forget 21 or 22 defences against mainly has beens and bums and i said mainly take away Kessler how the hell has he become ring magazines P4P number 2 or 3?

Most fighters resumes have has beens and bums on them and yet they still manage to loose. Also I have no idea how you can criticize calzaghes comp over the past 2 years or so with the exception of manfredo in there. He became p4p #2 by beating everyone put in front of him simple as. You can hate all you want on the man, and there is always going to be people hating on cal, he's just as good as his 45-0 would indicate, which is dam near superb. Who else could he have really fought other than roy, neither of which was willing to travel, b hop never came to terms back then, and don't even mention ottke. Its always the same story and if he goes on and beats roy, which won't mean much but if he then goes on to beat pavlik as well, as I think there is a decent chance he will, people will still be talking shit.

Ok what if joe calzaghe gets beat by a Roy jones who is well past his best?

Just isn't going to happen. If it did still wouldn't mean jack shit to me , in my eyes I'd view it as an off night for cal or maybe it be time for him to hang em up.

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Ok what if joe calzaghe gets beat by a Roy jones who is well past his best?

I'm sure they'll think of something...LoL!

See i wanted you guys to tell me why he is so good yet you just slate me rather than slating me fill me in.

Can't you just watch the fights? Or better yet state exactly why you think he's shit.

I think he is so good cos he wins. Is that OK?

Ive watched his fights ever since he fought Mark Delaney i only watch him so i don't miss him getting beat live.Now yes i'm saying he is shit and at the start of the thread im asking for you guys to tell me why he isn't crap yet rather than fill me in you slate me so perhaps i'm right he doesn't deserve his P4P#2 spot and he is well overrated.

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Ive watched his fights ever since he fought Mark Delaney i only watch him so i don't miss him getting beat live.Now yes i'm saying he is shit and at the start of the thread im asking for you guys to tell me why he isn't crap yet rather than fill me in you slate me so perhaps i'm right he doesn't deserve his P4P#2 spot and he is well overrated.

Shit people dont go 18yrs undefeated spending 11 as a champion, shit fighters dont beat Mikkel Kessler or Bernard Hopkins, shit fighters dont top the bill in LV.

Calzaghe is one of only two fighters ever to hold all 5 recognised titles in one weight division WBO,WBC,WBA,IBF,IBO shit fighters dont do that.

Shit fighters dont hold two ring magazine titles symaltaniously, shit fighters dont try and defend two titles at two different weights.

This has the 7 pages of nothing written all over it. Break out the vaseline, feelings are about to get hurt.

If Calzaghe was that great why would most boxing experts rank Roy Jones as the best Supermiddle of all time when he only had 6 world title fights at that weight and Calzaghe has had 23??

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

If Calzaghe was that great why would most boxing experts rank Roy Jones as the best Supermiddle of all time when he only had 6 world title fights at that weight and Calzaghe has had 23??

Who is most boxing experts? most have Calzaghe at number 1.

Mayweather only had 3 title fights at 147, will he go down as an all time welterweight? yes he will.

Lame arguments 4real.