The following is a statement I copied and pasted from the examiner.com. This damn argument is just going in circles:

"if i am a fighter and i’m offered $40million paycheck in just one night of battle, why would i make things hard for the fight to take place?

why would i demand a NEW WAY OF TESTING in a $40m paycheck fight, something that i’ve never done before on all of my previous fights, even to those where i only earned a million $ or less ?

if i’m really idealistic and believe that my sport, after so many decades, needs a NEW METHOD OF TESTING, should i just demand it later on a lower paying bout and just take this $40m paycheck fight?
or
if the NEW METHOD OF TESTING that i want is preventing me for getting into that $40m paycheck fight, should i just let go of that NEW METHOD OF TESTING,take the fight, collect my $40m, and just demand that NEW METHOD OF TESTING on my next, low paying bout?

….UNLESS…

UNLESS I REALLY DON’T WANT THAT $40 MILLION FIGHT!

now, if i really don’t want that $40m fight, how can i spin everybody’s head so that it would not look i'm ducking the fight!"