Thread: Does Pavlik have enough tatoos?

I think he could use a few more.. thoughts?

Bunch of stupid looking tats.

Pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look A LOT better than Pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

Originally Posted by Hulk

Pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look A LOT better than Pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

He looks? Lets see. He's from Youngstown. He peaked in life at 25. Bad drinking problem. Now that ugly ass tats. It's more is than looks

Originally Posted by violent demise

Originally Posted by hulk

pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look a lot better than pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

he looks? Lets see. He's from youngstown. He peaked in life at 25. Bad drinking problem. Now that ugly ass tats. It's more is than looks

niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice!

You can never have enough shitty tattoos.

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Originally Posted by Hulk

Pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look A LOT better than Pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

He looks? Lets see. He's from Youngstown. He peaked in life at 25. Bad drinking problem. Now that ugly ass tats. It's more is than looks

Cold!

i'll bet he cuts himself too...

Originally Posted by Hulk

Pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look A LOT better than Pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

Agreed, Cotto must have had a better tattoo artist doing his, Pavlik's just make him look like a wino.

Looking close at them, the artwork isn't bad. Most get tat's for themselves, not whether we're going to like them or not. What made him look bad was that poor performance against a guy i had never even heard of. He could have come into the ring with a pink stripe down his back for all i care. In the ring performace is what matters most. That lifting of his right hand every time he lands a big right instead of throwing a follow up punch is what he really should be worried about.

Cotto tats actually look really good. Pavlik's .. good artwork but too much. If you get more than 10 tattoos in less than a year , they seem meaningless usually, which ruins the purpose of a tattoo

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

Bunch of stupid looking tats.

For once I agree with you.