Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    I am completely lost as to why Alvarez does not just pick up the IBF belt. He can always vacate if they try to force him to fight a mandatory he does not like. I'm sure Bundrage would go to Mexico to get KTFO for the hell of it and a largest payday. He would probably be a 7:1 underdog

    There are a lot of good matchups at 154, and I just hope they get the ball rolling and give some good fights in 2013...
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    K9 is really a C level fighter and one of the weakest title holders of the past 10 years..

    Canelo has beaten better fighters than him and it's time for him to face the true elites already..

    K9 Bumrage is capable of testing Canelo in any way shape or form.. K9 is a bum.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,138
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3095
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Saul should fight Trout and then Floyd.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Saul should fight Trout and then Floyd.
    His promoters would never put him in front of a polished boxer like trout. He can actually be outboxed if someone had the endurance to run from him for 12 rounds and jab. I don't care how highly everyone thinks of him.

    I just think putting him in their with a big puncher is safer than putting him in with a great boxer.

    If you we're GBP what would you do?
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1326
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Quote Originally Posted by JonnyFolds View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Saul should fight Trout and then Floyd.
    His promoters would never put him in front of a polished boxer like trout. He can actually be outboxed if someone had the endurance to run from him for 12 rounds and jab. I don't care how highly everyone thinks of him.

    I just think putting him in their with a big puncher is safer than putting him in with a great boxer.

    If you we're GBP what would you do?

    I don't think Trout is exactly a polished boxer, although running and jabbing would be his best bet to beat Canelo imo. I'd certainly pick Alravez to win if it did happen. Have no idea whether his handlers would make the fight or not, but I'm hoping it does come off. As for Bundrage though, he wouldn't be any more of a test than an old Mosley was, in fact those two are probably similar threats at this stage. K9 may have earned that kind of a fight, but I don't see him having a chance to win.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    K9 is a hard worker with deceptive strength and power, well maybe the strength isn't so deceptive seeing as he's built like the incredible hulk.

    I agree Bundrage probably wouldn't have a shot against Canelo, but why not Bundrage vs. Keith Thurman ?

    I'd like to see that one.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    He's not a big enough time and has an ugly style which could spoil the fight. GBP knows this so it's not worth the risk.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Quote Originally Posted by mightyfighter View Post
    He's not a big enough time and has an ugly style which could spoil the fight. GBP knows this so it's not worth the risk.
    True, Bundrage would never be the kind of fighter to make a FOTY or anything, but they are trying to increase his marketability. He is v well known in Mexico, but not well known in the states. He is lightly regarded as a beltholder since winning his from Matthew Hatton (vomit).

    I just think the American challenger could add to his <American> rep & marketability quickly. Hell of a lot safer than, say Kirkland or Angulo!
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,962
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    The one that needs to happen is Alvarez and Trout. Though we should all chip in and give Bundrage anything he wants for dispatching Cory Spinks like a sloppy drunk out of the bar.

    I actually think Trout can cause more problems for Alvarez than he has seen. Don't think he beats him tomorrow but Canelo hasn't faced anything as shifty and fresh to date. As for K9, he and Angulo would be a fun free swinging train wreck!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1986
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Alvarez has to look good in his next fight so that people want to see him fight Mayweather. He might get a decision against Trout but if Trout makes him look bad it won't help build the Mayweather fight. Can't see Trout getting Alvarez anytime soon.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1406
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    I don't understand why people want the Trout fight for Alvarez so badly. It'll be a good test, but it won't set the world on fire in terms of excitement. Both Kirkland & Angulo are more exciting fights IMO and I'd like to see how good Alvarez chin is against a legit 154lber who can bang.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    771
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I don't understand why people want the Trout fight for Alvarez so badly. It'll be a good test, but it won't set the world on fire in terms of excitement. Both Kirkland & Angulo are more exciting fights IMO and I'd like to see how good Alvarez chin is against a legit 154lber who can bang.
    I heard Canelo doesn't like dogs so Angulo and K-9 are out.
    Seriously, I would like to see Trout vs Canelo, it would tell us a lot about both of them. Canelo was going to fight Ortiz but Lopez beat him, so Canelo fought Lopez. Canelo was going to fight Cotto but Trout beat Cotto, and was calling out Canelo who was ringside. There's enough drama there to generate a lot of interest, besides any fight Alvarez is in will be great. I like the excitement Canelo brings to the ring, I can understand why the Mexicans support him so much. They love the guy!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    46,962
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    I don't understand why people want the Trout fight for Alvarez so badly. It'll be a good test, but it won't set the world on fire in terms of excitement. Both Kirkland & Angulo are more exciting fights IMO and I'd like to see how good Alvarez chin is against a legit 154lber who can bang.
    Simply for me it's that there is no question Cotto would be next had Trout played his presumed role and not spoiled a date for Canelo. He's earned it and proven capable. As for excitement I think you can have good results with a styles clash rather than a Angulo or Kirkland who are just coming back from the scrap heap and proven rather easy to box. Angulo has along way to go with his punches looking not so harsh and getting hit on like a piƱata in his last give and take fight.

    Bigger is what Canelo would do for himself facing Trouts style being that Mayweather is
    on deck. He needs to face someone other than a single gear guy leading with his face if he hopes to prep for the total opposite in Mayweather. If he can't impress or do well with Trout he really doesn't belong fighting Mayweather right now.

    Edit, and never under estimate the selling point of a good "Im seeking revenge because
    you beat up my brother" tag line
    Last edited by Spicoli; 01-09-2013 at 04:51 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why NOT Alvarez vs Bundrage

    What a paradox.

    Victor Ortiz vs Josesito Lopez
    Josesito Lopez
    "Yeah I am brave enough to fight the winner of this fight, after all" -Alvarez

    Cotto vs Trout
    "Wait who is Austin Trout, again? I was supposed to fight Cotto!" -also, Alvarez

    Now, it could be that Trout is not a big enough draw, but why did that logic not apply after the Ortiz/Lopez fight
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. k9 Bundrage VS Mosley on the horizon
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-09-2011, 05:31 AM
  2. Ouma vs Bundrage
    By The Fightfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-28-2008, 06:58 PM
  3. Joel Julio vs. Cornelius Bundrage - WNF
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 07:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing