Hey,
What's funny with Larry Holmes reign as champion was that he NEVER fought for the WBA Championship, even though he very well could have beaten every WBA Chumpion of that era?
Let's take a look at this:
Larry Holmes reign as Champion (WBC and Ring and IBF) from 09/06/1978 to 21/09/1985. But, the guys who held the WBA Chumpionship of the time were:
Muhammad Ali (3) October 30, 1974 — February 15, 1978
Leon Spinks February 15, 1978 — September 15, 1978
Muhammad Ali (4) September 15, 1978 — October 18, 1979
John Tate October 20, 1979 — March 31, 1980
Mike Weaver March 31, 1980 — December 10, 1982
Michael Dokes December 10, 1982 — September 23, 1983
Gerrie Coetzee September 23, 1983 — December 1, 1984
Greg Page December 1, 1984 — April 29, 1985
Tony Tubbs April 29, 1985 — January 17, 1986
Holmes had beaten Ali and Weaver during his reign. If I extended the list post Tony Tubbs to 1987 and put up:
Tim Witherspoon January 17, 1986 — December 12, 1986
James Smith December 12, 1986 — March 7, 1987
These are two guys that Holmes beat already, so why is it that the WBA slighted Holmes? You mean to tell me that Holmes wasn't worthy of fighting Cotzee, Page, Tubbs, Dokes, Spinks (Leon) and Tate? LOLOLOL....
I think boxing writers and boxing analysts missed a prime opportunity to nip the first ergregious signs of boxing politics.
![]()
Bookmarks