Re: Why don't people believe Canelo Alvarez about the Mexican beef?
The truth is that it shouldn't matter whether people believe him. In just about every other major sport, motivation is not relevant in addressing drug test failures.
The core principle is that athletes are personally responsible for what goes into their body. They are all given extensive lists and details of what substances are banned, and the vast majority of them are very very careful of what they ingest - especially in the cases of over-the-counter medications and supplements (a Vicks inhaler contains enough banned substances for athletes to fail a drug test if they use one), and there are many many examples of people failing drugs tests like this.
Critically, there are even more examples of athletes NOT failing tests like this, so it is both possible and doable to manage ones diet and intake appropriately.
So my first point would be that it is not relevant where the drug came from. Arguing that he ate something by mistake is no defence. Alvarez failed the test, so he should be banned.
Secondly, I believe that just about everybody knows that lots of Mexican (and also North American) beef is contaminated with hormones and steroids. This is not news, especially to a native Mexican whose manager used to be a butcher!
Alvarez will have a nutritionist employed in his team, what was that person doing to earn their money?
Look at at the ridicule Tyson Fury faced when he tried to claim he failed a drug test because he had eaten too much wild boar. He still got banned didn't he?
So my second pointis that it's unlikely that Alvarez and his large professional team were unaware of the possibility of tainted meat in Mexico. I do not believe them when they say it must have been a mistake, and he ate something accidentally. Have they followed his food chain back to the provider and tested it? No.
My third point is that PED abuse is rife in boxing. There have been so many positive tests in the last ten years, and statistically this is likely to only be the tip of the iceberg. The governing bodies, promoters and vested interests essentially turn a blind eye to it, brushing stuff under the carpet or giving laughably short suspensions to the cheats.
This lack of outcome fuels future behaviour, so more boxers will cheat because they think they can get away with it, and because they believe everyone is doing it (i.e. Being clean turns into a disadvantage)
What will happen when someone is seriously injured, or dies, and their opponent fails a drug test. Is that premeditated murder, because it passes every test to qualify as that.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Bookmarks