i think novak is just playing his part in the nonsense
When it comes to science you cannot prove anything. Proving anything is an impossibility.
That is how science works.
We cannot possibly personally observe and measure everything and so we rely on using the best evidence available. People in labs with decades of experience in isolating and testing virus' have far better equipment and know how than you or I, and so we trust them to conduct the experiments.
You say you don't believe them, but we all know that is bullshit and you are just wanting to appear far more intelligent than you will ever be.
The frameworks put in place by the scientific method actually ensure that scientific theories, including the ones that say that Covid 19 is a virus that can be passed through droplets and aerosols, are a far closer example of reality and real knowledge than you or I conducting an experiment.
That would not be knowing anything. That would be believing something to be true without exposing our beliefs to any kind of scientific rigour or counter measures that would ensure the validity of our findings.
You see you do not even know the difference between knowing and believing yourself.
All you have done is formulate an opinion, a belief, and then dismissed anything that detracts from it.
Not only that but just like Brock, the fucking bell end, you have presented yourself as the hero of the story cutting thru all the misinformation swallowed ny the sheep and declaring that eveyone else is gullible.
Experts exist and you are not one.
Scientific concencus exists and your fairy tale wanna cwy wanna sweety questions mean jack shit.
If you examine the science and data then you are talking about truth.
When like you, you are insisting that your opinion trumps that data you are simply dealing in dreams and poppycock.
There are no fallacies in my argument.
It is a pretty simple and irrefutable fact that there is no such thing as scientific proof. All we have are the best possible theories that can be constructed to explain reality.
These theories are tested again and again to prove that they are the closest we can get to 'knowimg' anything. True knowledge. Truth.
Being an immature naive child you have rejected this idea of knowing anything and would rather believe in your own fictional made up stories about an individual with no scientific expertise carrying out a one off test that will back up your fairy tale belief.
Like Manuel, you know nothing, and don't even have the excuse of English not being your first language.
Your rejection of the idea of both the existence of experts and evidence is about as fallacious as one could get.
Science exists because the theory that best explains reality is repeatedly tested by experts. These theories are not just ideas, they are stringently tested models based on the best available knowledge. They are far closer to knowing than anything else in existence.
It is not my hypothesis. I have not formulated the question or carried out the hundreds of studies needed to test it. A single test would prove nothing without the large scale studies that proved their effectivness.
I have taken many PCR and LFT tests over the last 18 months and they all came back as negative until I developed symptoms of covid and the surprise, surprise both the lft and pcr came back as positive.
That is about as close to knowing as I am ever going to get.
You are are talking about fairy tales as you do not understand science or philosophical concepts at all.
TIC playing Private Baldrick in the Backadder court martial episode.
" Baldrick deny everything "
" Are you Private Baldrick " ?
But you are captain Blackadders batman " ?
"Come on Baldrick its me " !
No it isn't.
Calling hundreds of thousands of clinicians, scientists, and medics from all over the world who all agree that covid 19 is a virus that can exist outside of the body and be passed on by droplets and aerosols, "so called experts" and claiming that Covid 19 is "convid" again and again, demonstrates quite conclusively your denial of experts.
There is no need to carry out tests or experiments in person unless like you, one doesn't believe in experts, data and evidence.
You can't even express yourself clearly in English. When you say things like
"Evidence is not you proving your belief to be true"
"Explanations are not you proving your belief to be true"
Then you can't expect to be taken seriously.
The fallacy you have been repeatedly using with your flawed immature logic is a variant of the appeal to perfection fallacy, a false dichotomy that erroneously limits which options are available. A black and white type of thinking in which you are rejecting the commonly accepted scientific method because it can never be perfect.
It matters not to you that it is the best possible option for knowing something. In fact you are claiming that personal anecdotal evidence, casual, non systematic, uncorroborated claims are the only thing you will accept as 'knowing' something.
That is fallacious bullshit of the lowest order.
Third dose today, no noticable side effects yet, possibly saline again. My phone now has great 5g reception though...