Just looking to see whos watching what... There being showed @ the same time... ;)
Printable View
Just looking to see whos watching what... There being showed @ the same time... ;)
I wanna see Paulie get rocked by Cotto,
but my local bar has both fights!! ;D
c.c.  me too
This sucks, that they are on at the same time. Really grinds my gears...
So is SHOtime showing the Cotto slaughter or what? Or are they both PPV?
BOTH PPV
Hopkins Tarver without a doubt... What has Paulie done? Squat.. No way in hell Im going to put money in his pocket instead of Hopkins, not when he's already getting a world title shot he shouldn't. So what he's a younger fighter, and that that fight is seen to be more about the future of boxing... More than likely it is simply an untested prospect getting beat down by a much more tested prospect... Hopkins is a legend who has earned everything he's ever gotten in the ring and imo he deserves some respect for taking this fight and taking it very very seriously in hopes of ending his career in a huge way... paulie doesn't deserve to be facing Cotto, he doesn't deserve anyones $49, whatsoever... Even if Cotto Paulie was free I would still order Hopkins Tarver and watch it instead... Both Tarver and Hopkins are much better fighters than Cotto or Paulie, in every facet of boxing... I really don't see what gives that this fight is the same night, since they are both PPV it's pretty stupid I think, because cotto Paulie is an interesting match up that's worth seeing, it's just not worth paying for let alone when there is a big fight that is on the same night.
I think the Cotto-Paulie fight will have more action but I've been a B-HOP fan for years......I'm torn...I think the B-HOP/Tarver fight is going to be boring as all h*ll but If I had to pay for one it would be B-HOP...if someone else is paying though I might watch the Paulie-Cotto....Quote:
Originally Posted by "PRIDE OF PROVIDENCE"
See I think that Cotto Paulie will be the crap fight... either Cotto smashes his head in early, or Paulie runs and runs and runs and the fight sucks, imo. Hopkins Tarver could be boring too but I don't think it will be, I think both guys will try and be very agressive and make a huge statement..Quote:
Originally Posted by bigragu
Over here in the UK they've opted for cotto v paulie, and surely it'll be a better fight, as long as they engage, at least there's more chance of a good fight than B-hop vs Tarver, no doubt i'll be dogding the result and catching up with it later!
im with u Big :coolclick:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigragu
Both.
2 T.V.'s.
1 Lap Top.
2 Drunken Round by Rounds.
2 PPV fights.
1 Outrageous Charter Telecable bill
1 Severly p!ssed off wife.
1 Happy Drunken bitch if his two faves win.
There can only be 1 Wacko for sure heres a CC because you make me lolQuote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Two months ago, I was saying Paulie and Cotto, but Tarver and Hopkins seems like the better fight now. Tarver is not a boring fighter, Roy Jones inactivity just made him seem that way. Hopkins will fight at some point so I think this fight should be a good one. Oh yeah, BTW, Tarver in 5. ;D
Hopkins last fight will be on HBO the following week.
Malignaggi vs. Cotto will only be shown once.
Its amazing what passes for ppv these days. I'm not paying 50 cash to see cotto. I've seen way better fighters go through years of espn,shobox,boxing after dark proving themselves before they could be on ppv and now i'm supposed to pay to see a prospect. Thats all cotto is. They go around calling him a world champ but hes not. His title is weak(WBO) and so has his opposition.bhop/tarver is for the real light heavyweight championship. Its the fight thats worth the money.The cotto fight should be free and if it was i'd watch both but its not so i'll just get it from a friend later