BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Each to their own I guess,most of us here think that this is one of the best cards of the year for sure! All the fights have fight of the year written all over them!
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
U know what, u are certainly correct!!!!!!!!!! Not for pay per view.
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
"This is no Morales and Pacquiao III"
Even though that was kind of a given, since Pacquiao will most likely pwn morales again.
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.
I get what you are saying, HBO like every every major entertainment company tries to make as much profit as they possibly can. But since when has any entetainment company tried to offer value for money?
They all rip us off, charging £8 or more to get into a cinema to see a crappy movie, or charging us £15 to buy the same crappy movie on dvd after we've already paid to see it at the cinema.
Now they are charging us more money to have the same crappy movie on out PSP's or portable media players, then they will charge us yet more money for the soundtrack to the same crappy movie. Then in 30 years time, they will remake the same F****** crappy movie and charge us probably £25 to watch it at the cinema, £60 to buy it on whatever digital format they have invented for us to buy from them then and again charge us for the soundtracks, etc.
Personally I hate all of these corporatations and have pledged never to waste my money on any of their products again.
All I can say is that filesharing is a wonderful thing, yes I like that, you want me to pay? No thanks I'll just go here and download it free, F*** you very much :P
But and getting back on topic, this is actually one of the strongest cards of 2006. Three world title fights, potentially three tear ups.
If I was going to spend my money on a fight card, I would definitely consider this one :)
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it ;)
peace
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.
I get what you are saying, HBO like every every major entertainment company tries to make as much profit as they possibly can. But since when has any entetainment company tried to offer value for money?
They all rip us off, charging £8 or more to get into a cinema to see a crappy movie, or charging us £15 to buy the same crappy movie on dvd after we've already paid to see it at the cinema.
Now they are charging us more money to have the same crappy movie on out PSP's or portable media players, then they will charge us yet more money for the soundtrack to the same crappy movie. Then in 30 years time, they will remake the same F****** crappy movie and charge us probably £25 to watch it at the cinema, £60 to buy it on whatever digital format they have invented for us to buy from them then and again charge us for the soundtracks, etc.
Personally I hate all of these corporatations and have pledged never to waste my money on any of their products again.
All I can say is that filesharing is a wonderful thing, yes I like that, you want me to pay? No thanks I'll just go here and download it free, F*** you very much :P
But and getting back on topic, this is actually one of the strongest cards of 2006. Three world title fights, potentially three tear ups.
If I was going to spend my money on a fight card, I would definitely consider this one :)
I agree about the HBO SHO movie aspect and all but....I most definatlt agree on the PPV worthy aspect of this card...Complain maybe about if it was just Barrera and Juarez but this whole card is action packed
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by body head banger
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it ;)
peace
LOL I don't know what happened to the thread but you should have heard this guy going off about Lewis I think the name of the thread was So THIS IS BOXING.....
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by body head banger
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it ;)
peace
LOL I don't know what happened to the thread but you should have heard this guy going off about Lewis I think the name of the thread was So THIS IS BOXING.....
lol yeh bro i know!! crazy stuff ! :P
i commented on that... had to be a bit harsher on that one!! lol
lol my comment is a good ol read!! lol just dont think very much of this member to be honest...
just been dictatiing his views and speaking out of hand without explanation or reason!! lol
peace
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
I just don't like cowards in boxing (aka lennox lewis)
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Barrera vs Juarez 2 isn't PPV worthy imo, it will be a good fight but tbh I would rather see MAB fight Pacquioa again or Pacquioa fight Morales for a 3rd time. Now that's PPV worthy!
More of a storyline behind those fights, legends fighting each other reminicent of the 80's with Duran, Hagler, Hearns and Leonard.
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineboxer
I just don't like cowards in boxing (aka lennox lewis)
you are the definition of ignorance...
you wish a terrible death on another man, who HAS earned peoples respect..
you'll never earn my respect
and yet i still dont wish death upon you....
your stil a knob thoug ;)
Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy
I think it's up for debate that any card is worthy of PPV. But compared to all the other PPV cards this year...this one has to be the best.