-
Cotto, Quintana, more...
from www.fightnews.com
Buzz
Cotto, Quintana, more...
By Karl Freitag
An agreement in priciple has been reached for a December 2 fight between Miguel Cotto and Carlos Quintana in Altantic City. Apparently the vacant WBA welterweight title will be on the line. Ricky Hatton was stripped of that belt for not facing WBA #1 Oktay Urkal, so where Urkal fits into this scenario is still to be resolved. Cotto says he plans to keep his WBO 140lb belt, however a fight between Ricardo Torres and Mike Arnaoutis for that title (or an interim version) has been discussed.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
I see Cotto winning a close, hard fought decision.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve shit. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his ass to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
It's official
http://www.sho.com/site/boxing/calendar.do
I also think that Margarito is the undercar like is suppose to be
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve S***. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his a** to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
LOL, I actually agree with you, not gunna drop the sc's but I don't see how anyone could feel bad about Urkal not getting a shot at welterweight, his being anywhere near a top 10 ranking at 147 by any orginization is laughable... Let alone a mandatory.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve shit. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his ass to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve S***. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his a** to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
So your defending Urkal for fighting a 2-4 guy and going the distance... It doesn't mean a damn thing if he ran, and why would anyone watch a fight like that, Boxrec works just fine for identifying joke fighters. The fact is Urkal has beaten NOONE at welterweight, after losing to Harris twice at jr... And also, when Urkal Hatton was being lined up, I belive that was before Harris beat him twice, and the fact is he was a legitimate contender, at 140. Now, at welterweight, nah... just look who he's ranked ahead of, for your answer to #6..... Collazo, Quintana, Paul Williams.. Your going to tell me he deserves to be because the 2-4 fighter was on his bicycle and Urkal won?? Please.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve S***. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his a** to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
So your defending Urkal for fighting a 2-4 guy and going the distance... It doesn't mean a damn thing if he ran, and why would anyone watch a fight like that, Boxrec works just fine for identifying joke fighters. The fact is Urkal has beaten NOONE at welterweight, after losing to Harris twice at jr... And also, when Urkal Hatton was being lined up, I belive that was before Harris beat him twice, and the fact is he was a legitimate contender, at 140. Now, at welterweight, nah... just look who he's ranked ahead of, for your answer to #6..... Collazo, Quintana, Paul Williams.. Your going to tell me he deserves to be because the 2-4 fighter was on his bicycle and Urkal won?? Please.
Box Rec works just fine. :-X Thats a joke right? They have the worst ranking system ever. They don't even know how it works themselves, theres other sources out there look at 2 or 3 don't just look in BoxRec.
About the fight with Mier I mearly pointing out the fact that he hadn't seen the fight and was judging it without having seen it.
Your post is a bit confusing which comes to no surprise to me since it seems this 'nonsense' plague is going around here at Saddos.
My #6 Question was: If you don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
Your reply to that was: just look who he's ranked ahead of, for your answer to #6..... Collazo, Quintana, Paul Williams.. Your going to tell me he deserves to be because the 2-4 fighter was on his bicycle and Urkal won?? Please.
OK.... Well according to your sources you state above look who hes ranked ahead of then you list who heas ahead of. You then say are you going to tell me he deserves to be.....something not quite sure what you were trying to say there....
But anyway, Urkal like you yourself stated is ranked ahead of those guys and for that he deserves a shot at the title.
Bet you thought I'd be a good idea to jump in and help out Violent Demise, Huh?
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve shit. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his ass to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
I can do numbers.
#1. Homie is just a saying. I didn't think you would actually flatter yourself into thinking I considered you one.
#2. I got wait 24 hours.
#3. Boxing Rec is where you got his last opponents name. I don't need to use it. And Castillo was defending his title against an undefeated fighter. His opponent was 7-0, not 2-4. Not only that, Nashiro was not an unknown. He had been hype since his amateur days by the Japanese writers. But you wouldn't know that, cuz it doesn't say so on Boxing Rec, right?
#4. Nobody complained cuz everybody pretty much knew Hatton wasn't going to keep the the title. Still I don't remember anybody pushing for Hatton-Urkal, either
#5. He fought Tszyu. So what? That was like 6 years ago. And at 140. What's that got to do with him being worthy to fight for a title at 147?
#6. You don't really want me to name all the welterweights better than him, do you?
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve shit. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his ass to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
I can do numbers.
#1. Homie is just a saying. I didn't think you would actually flatter yourself into thinking I considered you one.
#2. I got wait 24 hours.
#3. Boxing Rec is where you got his last opponents name. I don't need to use it. And Castillo was defending his title against an undefeated fighter. His opponent was 7-0, not 2-4. Not only that, Nashiro was not an unknown. He had been hype since his amateur days by the Japanese writers. But you wouldn't know that, cuz it doesn't say so on Boxing Rec, right?
#4. Nobody complained cuz everybody pretty much knew Hatton wasn't going to keep the the title. Still I don't remember anybody pushing for Hatton-Urkal, either
#5. He fought Tszyu. So what? That was like 6 years ago. And at 140. What's that got to do with him being worthy to fight for a title at 147?
#6. You don't really want me to name all the welterweights better than him, do you?
A. Be a leader not a follower (I'll switch to letters now)
B. Me consider you my homie ??? You called me homie I didn't call you homie. But OK.
C. I got Remirs name from the fight, saw it on the net think it was mediazone.com. So being 7-0 is something special now? I didn't know that.
D. So becasue a fighter is hyped, it makes him better then someone who isn't? Something else I didn't know, damn! you sure do know a lot.
E. No I didn't know that about Nashiro, because I don't follow amateurs. It's bad enough trying to keep track of one pro. division, I just let them get here to the pros. I could give a rats ass what they did as amateurs. All that is out the door once they turn pro.
F. Right EVERYBODY knew, Hatton was gonna let go of the belt. ::** Shit! then by any chance do you know the wining numbers to the Lotto? :D
G. Everybody has a fight lined up. Pretty much, he doesnt and hes ranked among the best.
H. You don't have to name me the fighters you think are better then him. I know them my self but they are all lined up for a fight already.
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Crap!!
I'll be honest I'm not liking the fact that Urkal is gonna be pushed to the side, he should be made 'mandatory' for the winner of the WBA belt.
Cotto keeping the 140 belt as a security blanket just incase. ;)
It makes sense you words, at least I hope he gets the winner
He should, cuz hes been waiting in line for a minute now.
Yeah, Urkal really earned that title shot by going the distance in his last fight with a 2-4 fighter. Maybe, it was his two back-to-back losses to Vivian Harris that did. Come on, homie? Urkal don't deserve shit. I can't believe somebody actually feels bad the he's be pushed to the side. They need to push his ass to the the bottom of the rankings were he belongs. Post like this deserves about 3 sc's.
#1. I aint your homie.
#2. If giving me SC's makes you feel better then have at it. :D
#2A. Oooppss! guess you already did. ;)
#3. Stop realying on BoxRec and watch the actual fights for once, the 2-4 person that you called 'fighter' is Andrei Rimer if you watched the fight you'll see he was practically on a bike throughout the fight. Fact is Urkal won. Martin Castillo 3 yr. reiging WBA belt in SuperFlyweight Div. lost to Nobuo Nashiro who was 7-0 Martin was having trouble with Nashiro throughout the fight. All that means is NOBODY is invinsible regardless of the quality of your opposition.
#4. I didn't hear you complaining about Hatton-Urkal, he was getting a shot at the title there but everyone was fine with that. ::**
#5. He has 3 loses 2 to Vivian and 1 to Tszyu, no shame in that. Hes bounced back from that and if he was told your getting a title shot then damn! it give him one.
#6. If don't feel Urkal deserves it then who?
I can do numbers.
#1. Homie is just a saying. I didn't think you would actually flatter yourself into thinking I considered you one.
#2. I got wait 24 hours.
#3. Boxing Rec is where you got his last opponents name. I don't need to use it. And Castillo was defending his title against an undefeated fighter. His opponent was 7-0, not 2-4. Not only that, Nashiro was not an unknown. He had been hype since his amateur days by the Japanese writers. But you wouldn't know that, cuz it doesn't say so on Boxing Rec, right?
#4. Nobody complained cuz everybody pretty much knew Hatton wasn't going to keep the the title. Still I don't remember anybody pushing for Hatton-Urkal, either
#5. He fought Tszyu. So what? That was like 6 years ago. And at 140. What's that got to do with him being worthy to fight for a title at 147?
#6. You don't really want me to name all the welterweights better than him, do you?
A. Be a leader not a follower (I'll switch to letters now)
B. Me consider you my homie ??? You called me homie I didn't call you homie. But OK.
C. I got Remirs name from the fight, saw it on the net think it was mediazone.com. So being 7-0 is something special now? I didn't know that.
D. So becasue a fighter is hyped, it makes him better then someone who isn't? Something else I didn't know, damn! you sure do know a lot.
E. No I didn't know that about Nashiro, because I don't follow amateurs. It's bad enough trying to keep track of one pro. division, I just let them get here to the pros. I could give a rats ass what they did as amateurs. All that is out the door once they turn pro.
F. Right EVERYBODY knew, Hatton was gonna let go of the belt. ::** Shit! then by any chance do you know the wining numbers to the Lotto? :D
G. Everybody has a fight lined up. Pretty much, he doesnt and hes ranked among the best.
H. You don't have to name me the fighters you think are better then him. I know them my self but they are all lined up for a fight already.
Tell me you don't sound foolish.
CMM: Why Cotto-Quintana get to fight for the 147 belt Hatton gave up?
VD: I think it's a good fight, if not them. Than who?
CMM: Well what about Urkal? Why he getting shafted?
VD: Cuz he don't deserve it
CMM: What? He's the mandatory.
VD: Homie, I don't
CMM: We ain't homies
VD: Like I was saying, MICK. I don't care what he is. He ain't worthy. His last opponent was 2-4 and still lasted the distance.
CMM: That's cuz he ran all night. Don't mean he wasn't good.
VD: Who's not good?
CMM: Urkal's last opponent
VD: What's his name?
CMM: Uh? Hold on, let me check boxing rec. Andrei Rimer. Yeah, that's it. He's good.
VD: He was 2-4
CMM: Don't mean he not good
VD: Urkal has almost 40 fights. What the hell is he doing fighting someone who's 2-4?
CMM: Uh, Uh. Urkal fought Tszyu. And Harris
VD: And lost to them. What's your point?
CMM: That Urkal should get the title shot
VD: Cuz he fought Tszyu 5 years ago. At a diffrent weight?
CMM: Yeah
VD: I see
CMM: Plus everybody better already fighting, so Urkal should get the fight
VD: So that's the way it works
CMM: What's wrong with that
VD: It's stupid
CMM: Not it's not
VD: Yes it is
CMM: NO IT'S NOT! I'M TELLING SADDO
VD: Go ahead. I'll be shocked if he thinks Urkal deserves a title shot
CMM: Saddo is my friend
VD: I'm sure he is. Later Mick
-
Re: Cotto, Quintana, more...
;D
Thats some of the worst comedy (if thats what you wan't to call it) I've ever seen typed.
First off the things YOU typed are just that something you typed. I didn't say those things, you worded them to your convinience to try and make yourself sound like you know what your doing here. You sound like your getting pissed off, relax it's just a debate.
And theres no need for me tell go telling Saddo issh!!! I can hold my own, issh!! llike this gones down everyday here it's knowing that we are debating about the sport, not about who I know here or who I don't. Once you felt you had nothing else to talk about actual facts rather then your 'comedy central' reject scripts that you tried to imply here, you just jumped on other stuff and now are talking about other people.This here is all you and me, theres no need to bring up names of people who aint got issh! to do with this here. But don't worry you won't be the 1st or the last to end up with your tail tucked between your legs. So don't feel bad, just get back on here once you've actually learned something about the sport. Take my advice stop using BoxRec. (If you notice I told you stop being a follower be a leader, I used the BoxRec against you and you came back at me with the same thing I had just said) be original.
I know it takes time, but you'll get it one day.
If you need help with anything on boxing, don't hesitate to ask I'm here to learn and also help.
By the way your welcome. ;)
