Pacquiao/Morales III is going to be a stinker!

Well, there most likely will be a brutal Pac KO in the early rounds for some limited excitement, but the fight will not even be the least bit competitive.

Why? Morales is completely shot as a fighter...and, and...this is a big and...his corner is complete CRAP. Massaging his legs in the last fight??? WTF was that? That was the absolutle last thing he needed at the time.

Ol' Erik eeeeeked out a decision in the first fight and goes on to get completely destroyed by Raheem. Then, gets KTFOd by Pac in the rematch as was expected because he was long, long SHOT as a fighter.

And now he gets third fight??? Who the hell even wants to see this fight? Let alone lay down 50 bucks to see a walking stiff get KOed?? I'd rather watch a early Tyson fight for free on ESPN Classic.

Morales is done, completely and definitively. This fight is a joke.

i would agree to you bro but not entirely...

first of all, EM is highly motivated on this one...he is determined to take himself in the winning track once more and more importantly, avenging his most embarrassing loss(so far) from the hands of PAC...

EM is a fighter and a proud Mexican warrior, he wouldn't go out without dishing a very competitive fight...

I say, we will get our money's worth, every single penny of it, specially if you are a PAC fan. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bleech1

Well, there most likely will be a brutal Pac KO in the early rounds for some limited excitement, but the fight will not even be the least bit competitive.

Why? Morales is completely shot as a fighter...and, and...this is a big and...his corner is complete CRAP. Massaging his legs in the last fight??? WTF was that? That was the absolutle last thing he needed at the time.

Ol' Erik eeeeeked out a decision in the first fight and goes on to get completely destroyed by Raheem. Then, gets KTFOd by Pac in the rematch as was expected because he was long, long SHOT as a fighter.

And now he gets third fight??? Who the hell even wants to see this fight? Let alone lay down 50 bucks to see a walking stiff get KOed?? I'd rather watch a early Tyson fight for free on ESPN Classic.

Morales is done, completely and definitively. This fight is a joke.

---

Morales did not eek out a decision in the first fight, he completely outfought Manny and decisevely handed him his ass, the only reason it was even close is because Morales fought southpaw in the 12th ,and still Pac wasn't really getting the better of him.. I can see where your coming from, Morales has looked shot in his last 2 fights, but he looked much better in the rematch with Pac then he did against Raheem, and with the training and nutrition regime he is under for this fight he could possibly have another great performance left... I think the discouraging thing for MOrales fans is that he demanded the rematch so soon after Pac beat him, he doesn't really know if he can get back into great shape or not, he just said make the fight and then Ill try.. I would have liked to see him take a tune up and prove he was better conditioned, then call for the rematch.

hmmmmmm a stinker huh? good thing my Ringside seats were FREE then? ahahaha :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheBESTP4P

hmmmmmm a stinker huh? good thing my Ringside seats were FREE then? ahahaha :P

---

I can't think of a worst fight to be ringside. What a complete and utter waste.

Yeah, good thing they were free.  I'd rather be ringside for a local fight with two relatively unknowns.  The only way you could get me to that fight would be to PAY me.

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for. ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him ???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for. ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him ???

---

:appl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for. ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him ???

---

CC Mick, great points.. The 2nd fight was a great fight as well, I didn't see anything there that suggested Erik couldn't beat PAc, but he definetly needs to improve his conditioning and box more if he want's any chance of doing so this time around.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheBESTP4P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for. ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him ???

---

:appl:

---

It's just real spit.....
I mean I loves me some ERIK but boxing is boxing thats what it's about kicking ass or getting yours kicked.

I'm just being real I wan't Erik to win but something is betraying my thoughts on the fight.....

But for bleech1 to say 'Theres no point in a 3rd fight? Thats just insane. Iswear in all honesty even IF I knew that the outcome of the fight was gonna be a PAC victory and theres was some way for me to stop it from happening I wouldn't. Cause I've said it many times, 1st I love the sport then comes boxers in that order. If PAC wining this fight means more media more exposure then I'm ALL for it. Eriks done with his career what MILLIONS have tried and failed. If he goes out loosing he wont be the 1st or the last to do so.

I can easily hack back at PAC but theres no need to cause this here is about your post not PAC. He deserves the credit that he gets and hes earned it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for.  ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.  

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him  ???

---

I am not a Pac fan persay, nor am I Morales hater.  It's just that this is not the "superfight" PPV fight that some would like to believe it is.  In the fights you mentioned everyone had every reason to be thinkt they would be competitive fights.  Events leading up to this third fight show otherwise; specifically, that everything points to Erik getting KTFOd.

According to your criteria, you would think any bum thrown in with Pac would be a competitive fight becuase he would have two hands and would be swinging them.  ???  Sure, I'll agree that right up untill Morales is KTFOd, he will be swinging away.  That in no way makes for a competitve fight.  Chuck me in there with Pac, and Ill swing away for the 20 sec it takes me to get KOed.  Still not a competitive fight.

Morales is shot and this "superfight" is a complete farce.

BTW, everytime you type "your" and you mean "you're" it hurts my brain.

it's just normal for fight fans(not just Morales and PAC fans) to want more because it will be a rubbermatch and for both fighters to prove that their first V was no fluke(specially Erik).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bleech1

Well, there most likely will be a brutal Pac KO in the early rounds for some limited excitement, but the fight will not even be the least bit competitive.

Why? Morales is completely shot as a fighter...and, and...this is a big and...his corner is complete CRAP. Massaging his legs in the last fight??? WTF was that? That was the absolutle last thing he needed at the time.

Ol' Erik eeeeeked out a decision in the first fight and goes on to get completely destroyed by Raheem. Then, gets KTFOd by Pac in the rematch as was expected because he was long, long SHOT as a fighter.

And now he gets third fight??? Who the hell even wants to see this fight? Let alone lay down 50 bucks to see a walking stiff get KOed?? I'd rather watch a early Tyson fight for free on ESPN Classic.

Morales is done, completely and definitively. This fight is a joke.

---

I am not putting an ounce of spit on your stock.

Morales is not done.

I will not forget you bleech1. The day after the fight I am going to post a snap shot of your post.


;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bleech1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Thanks for sharing your opinion thats what we were ALL waiting for. ::** Now I can fall a sleep comfortably.


You know bleech1 who knows you probably are right & your porbably predicting the right thing. But even then regardless if the fight ends early in the rds. that does not mean it won't be a comptetive fight.

Hagler-Hearns lasted 3 rds.
Foreman-Lyle lasted 5 rds.
JCC-ODLH I lasted 4 rds.
Tszyu-ZAB lasted 2 rds.

Your saying it wont be comptetive all the fights listed above were short but they were also competetive even the old JCC got 1 or 2 shots into ODLH....The only way it wont be a comptetive fight is if your gonna tie up Eriks hands cuz other then that regardless if hes loosing those hands of his will be swinging away.

I personally in my heart WAN'T & THINK Erik is gonna win, but theres something in the back of my head that keeps replaying over & over and thats Erik holding on to the rope & looking up at Bayless. He just looked out of it and who wouldn't after moving up & down in weight and fighting these guys back 2 back;

Chavez
Heranandez
MAB
PAC
Raheem

I just don't understand how you can ask why theres a 3rd fight? they are 1-1 in fights regardless of how the fights were won..... The only reason I can think you don't want PAC-ERIK III is because you think PAC can loose the fight. If your so sure that he can beat Erik inside of 5 rds. then why wouldn't you wan't PAC to do so that way he can catapult in the top spots of P4P and shut everybody up? Not usre why a TRUE Pac fan wouldn't want that for him ???

---

I am not a Pac fan persay, nor am I Morales hater. It's just that this is not the "superfight" PPV fight that some would like to believe it is. In the fights you mentioned everyone had every reason to be thinkt they would be competitive fights. Events leading up to this third fight show otherwise; specifically, that everything points to Erik getting KTFOd.

According to your criteria, you would think any bum thrown in with Pac would be a competitive fight becuase he would have two hands and would be swinging them. ??? Sure, I'll agree that right up untill Morales is KTFOd, he will be swinging away. That in no way makes for a competitve fight. Chuck me in there with Pac, and Ill swing away for the 20 sec it takes me to get KOed. Still not a competitive fight.

Morales is shot and this "superfight" is a complete farce.

BTW, everytime you type "your" and you mean "you're" it hurts my brain.

---

About you're & your pardon my ability to go back and correct it or to even bother to hit 'spell check' this is a boxing site not grammer school. But if I must say.....it's spelled 'think' not 'thinkt', 'because' not 'becuase', 'until' not 'untill' ::**

Anyway!!! Your not a PAC fan.
If the following statement does not SCREAM out Pac-Fan then I don't know what will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bleech1

Well, there most likely will be a brutal Pac KO in the early rounds for some limited excitement, but the fight will not even be the least bit competitive.

Why? Morales is completely shot as a fighter...and, and...this is a big and...his corner is complete CRAP. Massaging his legs in the last fight??? WTF was that? That was the absolutle last thing he needed at the time.

Ol' Erik eeeeeked out a decision in the first fight and goes on to get completely destroyed by Raheem. Then, gets KTFOd by Pac in the rematch as was expected because he was long, long SHOT as a fighter.

And now he gets third fight??? Who the hell even wants to see this fight? Let alone lay down 50 bucks to see a walking stiff get KOed?? I'd rather watch a early Tyson fight for free on ESPN Classic.

Morales is done, completely and definitively. This fight is a joke.

---

A mistake from Eric is trying to give the fans a good exciting fight like he has said before on other fights: "Yes, I was already winning on points and it was the last round but I wanted to give the fans an exciting fight so I went in there and exchanged punches".

Eric fought a smart fight on their first fight. Whenever Pac charged with his typical one-two attack Eric would just move to the side like a Matador and maintain his distance with his long jab and straight right to earn him and EASY desicion with a clean face and PAC quite not the same.

On the second fight he wanted to "make it exciting" and that was a mistake.

Chino

im a pac fan and an avid floyd fan
but i shall admit that 63.86% of my posts
are about pac because theres not much of a debate/topic
about floyd that didnt pissed me off and made me have a nice day
and i shall also admit that im here in this forum ryt now
mainly because of pac and mainly because i respect morales
im here to back pac and to be updated about the latest issues
because im excited for the rubbermatch more than my wife giving birth to our first baby
i honestly think that EM has a better chance of winning more than MAB does
i feel EM has the tools although i dont really count the pac-em1 fyt for him
i calculated their chances of winning against pac and it was 39.26% for EM and 31.28% for MAB
(i see your good in grammar, maybe YOUR also good in math so please correct me if im wrong)
and if pac will be against someone else then i might not be here posting this
or if he was against you bleech1 then i might feel as relaxed and confident and calm and complacent and feel peaceful as ever
and the world will be a better place to live then
but he was against morales and i respect him
thats why im here dude

by the way this fight will really be exciting. try to remember that when you piss your pants ryt at the moment when michael buffer says 'lets get ready to rumble on the 18th of nov. i'll know you'll be watchin ;)