Printable View
Will try get down there and get an interview with scott sometime soon, gunna let him get through this loss with some peace first tho, but he has said today he wants a rematch with williams. Williams however is uncertain about his future and might consider retiring now.
If he doesn't he will be looking for a new trainer.
I doubt Williams will want to fight Gammer again until after he's lost the rubber match with Skelton.
Can anyone say Gammer vs Harrison in June?
i acctually think it will happen being honest it just looks like a cycle of british heavyweight fights were nobody can see who the best is, its kinda strange but what is A-Fraud said anything about world domination again? hes screwed now there is nothing for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
The UK scene is utterly bizarre!!! Ive no idea what to make of this swings and roundabouts stuff!
To be honest i really wanted Gammer to win against Williams and after the first 2 or so rounds i thought he was going to... than Williams woke up.
but the only reason for me wanting that is Gammer would have been the future for the UK scene but its back to square one again really with no real force for us.
If Gammer would have been the future I think we'd all prefer to live in the past.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saddo
We DO have one consistent, unbeaten heavy who is always in shape and gives 100% every fight......
Mat Skelton, he was robbed against Williams first time around, did a number on him the second time around and has bulldozed everybody else.
He should already be set as Britain's number 1, making him fight Sprott again is a farce, the guy deserves his title shot now imo.
He'd knock Gammer out for sure if they fought, will finish Sprott and would break Harrison's heart. IMO he's also 2-0 with Williams.
I watched the match last night, and thought it was a good effort from both fighters, they both did the HW division proud at least in my opinion. Danny looked very good physically, might have lost the weight too fast, as a result had some flat moments , overall Williams did a bang up job, I'm glad he came through ! Grammer reminds me a of Vinny Madalone , He does not get the full leverage going and thus his power is a bit short. , nice match though ! O0
but he's 40, hes got 2 years tops in him, then who we got???Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
i actually thing haye could KO sprot, harrison etc but only if he gains the weight properly, not pie munching as williams will tell ya how effective that can be
Hah..You know what made me laugh..
Gammer said he didnt feel right and felt drained.. Im guessing that meant wieght drained..
My question to him...
How in the world can you be weight drained when you got tits? :laugh:
gammer put alot of weight on for the fight as they didnt expect williams to lose 4 stone!!! heaviest he has ever fought atQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
He was only a few pounds heavier though he lost and thats that he needs to save his excuses for when Audley,Sprott or Skelton beat him no wonder he did'nt want Audley after he beat Williams Scott Gammer is shit and one pacedQuote:
Originally Posted by beds
im not making excuses for him, always thought williams would win, even the 20 stone version
Don't know about Williams retiring Gammer should give it some thought because he could'nt beat Wiliams he can't beat Audley,Sprott or Skelton whats he gunna do fight Krence again and again or Mcdermott bore bore bore
its dissapointing to see any boxing 'fan' call another boxer 'shit' Gammer i highly doubt will ever make an impact on the world scene. if he turned Pro in his early 20s and had a good amature back round and wasn't trained by his dad he may of had a chane.Quote:
Originally Posted by tysonbruno
Scott is a good boxer, i just don't think his dad has what it takes to train him to compete with the top british heavys. He does lack power - and the game plan they used back fired on them; they gambbled on williams's body being weak and vunrable but it wasn't. IF you had any clue about boxing you wouldn't come out and say he was shit - he kept that fight very close. it was lack of experience and maybe the williams fight came to soon for scott, there were little things fighters pick up to that he lacked, he alowed danny to walk him down and tire him out, watch the knock out scott had given 3 very hard minutes in the 8th and a hard min in the begining of the ninth he had little left as he ws out of shape. There is no doubt in my mind williams could feel gammers blow weakening and thats why he went in for the kill when he did.
Its realy said when shit posters like your self start throwing words around like 'shit' when they describe honest hard working fighters like gammer. To be honest its sad and dissapointing when any boxer is called 'shit' im not saying overrate them all, but mention they lack certain attributes that seperate them from their 'peers' - but you can't do that can you? 'coz frankly you seem to have ur few fav fighters sheffield way it seems and just claim they are so great. i don't think i have ever seen you make a post where you have said anyhting about a technice, or attribute, style foot work, anyhting that makes a boxer beat the other one - it seems you know fuck all in fact apart from some boxers name.
:sadclick: just for being sad
Now tell me if im wrong but this site is for people's opinions on fights and fighters now i give my opinions only to keep getting pulled over them and get a slagging by people like yourself.Now if i was saying stuff like god Ricky Hatton and Joe Calzaghe are great they are so good i would be ok i could be in your lots gang truth is there not great they are just good in my opinion ive been following boxing since i was 5 so thats 21 year as a fan only to be told by you i know in your words fuck all apart from boxers names.Well thats your opinion and and unlike you i will take this onboard so you enjoy yourself on your soapbox giving me a hard time you boxing encyclopedia you and by the way Gammer is SHIT! :lickish:Quote:
Originally Posted by Preme