this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
1 Muhammad Ali 2,026 1960 - 1981 56-5-0
2 Joe Louis 1,568 1934 - 1951 69-3-0
3 Gene Tunney 1,500 1915 - 1928 82-1-3
4 Rocky Marciano 1,378 1947 - 1955 49-0-0
5 Evander Holyfield 1,054 1984 - 2007 41-8-2
6 Larry Holmes 1,037 1973 - 2002 69-6-0
7 Floyd Patterson 975 1952 - 1972 55-8-1
8 Harry Wills 974 1911 - 1932 79-10-4
9 Lennox Lewis 957 1989 - 2003 41-2-1
10 Mike Tyson 930 1985 - 2005 50-6-0
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
How the fuck is hollyfield the 5th best heavyweight of all time! ???
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dezmundo1983
How the F*** is hollyfield the 5th best heavyweight of all time! ???
Holyfield shouldn't be higher than Holmes Gene Tunney is way too high Patterson shouldn't be there neither should Willis.
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Wheres Audley Harrison?????? He said he was number one.
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by beerjelly
Wheres Audley Harrison?????? He said he was number one.
Hahahahahaha! :D
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
rocky is better than tunney
holmes is better than hoylfield
where does harry wills come from
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
That list isn't great, but it's not as bad as the other one with Klitchko on it.
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
That list isn't great, but it's not as bad as the other one with Klitchko on it.
Yea thats for sure :)
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknowndonor
That list isn't great, but it's not as bad as the other one with Klitchko on it.
Yea thats for sure :)
Haha yea that was a joke.
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Were is Jack Johson on this list.?
And Tunney at three ? are you kiddin me ?
Lewis doesn't deserve to be up there with these greats
Holmes should be as high as nr 4 with Marciano moving to third spot
i also miss Frazier
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
"Chopped Chuck" Wepner # 2 ALL TIME! ;D
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
And put in Tony "Two Ton" Galento in for good measure ;)
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
The funny thing is Klitschko would have a great chance at beating all the fighters on this list.I could easily put Klitschko in that list.Just because the competition of this era isn't the same as when Louis and Ali were around doesn't mean he couldn't compete with them.Heavyweights now days are bigger and stronger and that is a fact.I really doubt Marciano would have a record like that fighting guys weighing 250+lbs and having the power they poses.He only fought 11 guys over 200lbs and they were just over 200lbs.Louis fought only 18 fighters who were over 200lbs!Patterson 14.Tunney less than 5.You have to take that into consideration.You can't just write him off, if you do you aren't really thinking it through.
Re: this top ten heavyweight of all time list is bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitschkofan
The funny thing is Klitschko would have a great chance at beating all the fighters on this list.I could easily put Klitschko in that list.Just because the competition of this era isn't the same as when Louis and Ali were around doesn't mean he couldn't compete with them.
I'm not sure which Klitschko you're talking about, but it really doesn't matter, because neither Vitali nor Wlad should even be mentioned in the same sentence as Muhammad Ali or Joe Louis.
I get that part of your argument is the weight issue, but if Ali and Louis had access to 21st century training techniques, both of them would give either of the Klitschko brothers an asskicking.
In fact, they could probably do it even without the modern training.