Originally Posted by Bilbo
Anyway what makes it stranger is that this rationale is not carried over into their divisional rankings. If for example the Ring argue that Taylor has dropped down because they 'think' he's not as good as other fighters even though he keeps winning then they should hold to that consistency in all their ranking but they don't.
They rate Oleg Maskaev as the number 3 heavyweight in the world whereas I'm SURE that EVERBODY would be able to pick maybe a dozen or so heavyweights that would be favourites to beat him, just off the top of my head I'll rattle off, Klitschko, Peter, Chagaev, Thompson, Brewster, Brock, Byrd, Valuev, Chambers, Ibragimov, hell even Holyfield, David Haye and Bernard Hopkins would probably go off as betting favourites against him. In fact when B Hop announced his intentions to fight Maskaev everyone said he was looking for an 'easy' heavyweight title and that they didn't care for that fight at all.
I think maybe the Ring rankings arn't as hallowed and sacred as people believe. :-\