WE WOULDNT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THESE NON-SENSE CLAIMS THAT CALZAGHE IS GREAT
lacy would have lost to tsypko and calzaghe would still be beating bums claiming that his WBO darkmatch fourth string jones counts againt B-HOPS 4 belt defense record
Printable View
WE WOULDNT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THESE NON-SENSE CLAIMS THAT CALZAGHE IS GREAT
lacy would have lost to tsypko and calzaghe would still be beating bums claiming that his WBO darkmatch fourth string jones counts againt B-HOPS 4 belt defense record
Hey you can't count out the beating against the Great Peter Manfredo Jr. Now that is what I call legacy.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Wake me up when this guy talks some sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by SalTheButcher
you cant dispute that buddyQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
the only win worth mentioning for calzaghe is lacy, who would have been forgotten if the first tsypko fight didnt end in a NC
Why is Calzaghe in 90% of peoples top ten p4p, if he is this bum you say he is? Mate the guy has some skills, just becasue he is not your cup of tea, he is a class boxer and his am and pro record suggests this, the 168 division is not the deepest and never really has, when he fights Kessler he would of fought the number 2 in the division that he is number 1 in within 18 months, Lacy was number 2 and i bet you were one of the guys weho saw Calzaghe going down within 6.
NOQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
i said down in 3 ;)
anyway lacy turned out to have NO defense whatsoever
Lacy was manhandling Typsko in their first bout, he had the right hand working in that one.