Originally Posted by NotGuilty136
Here's the parallels between gladiators and boxers:
Gladiator fights were to the death, boxing used to be until one man dropped but ws later reformed. Now there's time limits, decisions, and referee jurisdiction to stop a fight in case one is getting badly injured.
Most boxing fans don't HAVE to see a knockout in order to be entertained where as the losing gladiator had to be killed for the crowds satisfaction (reasom rome finally collapsed is basically because it was more interested in watching the deaths of its citizens as opposed to concentrating on fighting off its enemies which it was surrounded by).
Winning gladiators got the best of life: Money, fame, and virtually anything else they wanted. Boxers (and pro athletes in general) today receive about the same benefits.
Sure there's technique for stabbing someone with a sword, but boxing has a much more technical aspect to it than just shear brutality.
Boxers usually hug and converse after a fight where as there was only one galdiator left after a fight.
They have similarites and differences but when you put it into perspective, boxing is nowhere near as barbaric as the gladiator times. People who want boxing banned because its too "violent" are ignorant of the sport. Killing isn't a sport, boxing is.