90s vs 2000s WW Quarterfinals Oscar de la Hoya vs Shane Mosley

Yes ladies and gentlemen. Oscar having the lowest percentage of the 90s in the first round and Mosley having the best of the 2000s can only mean one thing. We will finish the triology. Please remember this is still prime for prime at WW but lets assume they already fought eachother just to make it interesting.

"Yeah, I think we all saw what I can do against De la Hoya. I will be happy to show you a gain" said Mosley in this highly anticipated match up.

"I already beat him, I don't care what the judges say, I won that fight and I will beat him again" replied a very energetic Golden Boy.

i think a 90s De La Hoya would be able to pull this off

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caleoh12

i think a 90s De La Hoya would be able to pull this off

---

What was different about the 2000 version of Oscar ?? no difference he was in his prime vs Mosley simple as the 2nd fight Mosley just didn't throw punches and went through bad patch with Forrest, Oscar 2, Wright 1, prime for prime Mosley wins again simple as there was no difference so its silly statement to say the 90s version of Oscar would be able to pull it off because what was different about 1998 version who fought Chavez or Oscar who fought Trinidad in 1999 ??

Anyway prime for prime Mosley would win a ud.

I gotta go with ODLH this is by far the closest match-up of the tournament so far.
115-113 type match anything under 147 I would say Mosley.

Mosley again.

this is hard but i went for de la hoya. close decision

Mosley would win a close, tough fight!

People that voted for Delahoya in this thread are hella foolish.



This fight already happened............... It was Delahoya vs. Mosley 1. Do the people who voted for Oscar in this thread think it was even remotely close? Seriously?






Didn't think so.