I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
This would be a great fight! a pure boxer with awesome skills v an ultra agressive but 1 dimensional fighter,with good power.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Gamo, I've done some searching but have come up empty.
By any chance do you have ANY IDEA why they haven't changed the decision.
On the Rachman-Condes fight from SD to UD?
I've searched and I even sent an e-mail to someone at the IBF but he didn't respond.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Gamo, I've done some searching but have come up empty.
By any chance do you have ANY IDEA why they haven't changed the decision.
On the Rachman-Condes fight from SD to UD?
I've searched and I even sent an e-mail to someone at the IBF but he didn't respond.
I know there was a mix up in the scoring,Rahman recieved more points than he should have done when the judges were adding up the scores.Can't remember where I read that but it sounds plausible.How do you know they have not changed the decision?
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
I would lean towards Little Pacquiao.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Gamo, I've done some searching but have come up empty.
By any chance do you have ANY IDEA why they haven't changed the decision.
On the Rachman-Condes fight from SD to UD?
I've searched and I even sent an e-mail to someone at the IBF but he didn't respond.
I know there was a mix up in the scoring,Rahman recieved more points than he should have done when the judges were adding up the scores.Can't remember where I read that but it sounds plausible.How do you know they have not changed the decision?
One, I read it on ESPN a while back. Two I read it on Ring Mag. Three it was also on fightnews.....
And four:
"Fight announcer called the scores as follows: (Judge: Lagumbay) 112-114 for Rachman, (Judge:Suriyachand) 112-114 for Rachman and (Judge:Rios) 117-113 for Condes, but later it was found as error, and the scores have been revised without changing the decision."
So if I understand this right the announcer read those scores above which meant Rachman won. But they found an error in the scores and changed them to 115-111 for Condes, 114-112 for Condes and 112-114 for Rachman.
Maybe I should wait and see what Ring Mag prints out this year on their almanac that should settle that dispute I'm having with myself here. ;D
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Yo bro Gamo, how you've been?
Not sure about our boy, he's a punch eater. I think he won't last long as a champ unless he changes his style. Don't know much about Niida. But of course, hope our boy Condes wins. Wait a second, Niida is our boy too. But since I'm here, I'll go with the local boy, that's Condes, of course.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
I think I might have confused myself there with the scores...
But the decision is still marked as SD, when it should be UD.
That's what I was originally asking.
I'm gonna try and resend the e-mail see if someone responds this time.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
I think I might have confused myself there with the scores...
But the decision is still marked as SD, when it should be UD.
That's what I was originally asking.
I'm gonna try and resend the e-mail see if someone responds this time.
Dude your confusing yourself. ;D ;D ;D They probably won't email back because there is nothing to say. It was an SD,changed to a UD,without OFFICIALLY being changed,probably because they could not be assed. Either way,Condes won by UD or SD. It's still a W.
Quote:
Originally Posted by penalosafan
Yo bro Gamo, how you've been?
Not sure about our boy, he's a punch eater. I think he won't last long as a champ unless he changes his style. Don't know much about Niida. But of course, hope our boy Condes wins. Wait a second, Niida is our boy too. But since I'm here, I'll go with the local boy, that's Condes, of course.
My man,how have you been?How are things? I thing Condes is a little too 1 dimensional for my liking but he is certainly strong and agressive. I love Niida's style,although I've only seen his last 3 fights,he's excellent to watch. I'd favour Niida for sure.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
I think I might have confused myself there with the scores...
But the decision is still marked as SD, when it should be UD.
That's what I was originally asking.
I'm gonna try and resend the e-mail see if someone responds this time.
Dude your confusing yourself. ;D ;D ;D They probably won't email back because there is nothing to say. It was an SD,changed to a UD,without OFFICIALLY being changed,probably because they could not be assed. Either way,Condes won by UD or SD. It's still a W.
Well what the fuck! >:mad I want it officially changed to UD. >:mad
;D
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
LOL,my man Mick,you've messed it up. Condes won. There is no doubt about the winner. The ONLY doubt was whether he won via UD or SD. It was initially an SD but was shcnaged to a UD? Get it? Rachman didn't win,it's an L for him,the only issue is whether the L is a UD or SD. It SHOULD be a UD?
I think I might have confused myself there with the scores...
But the decision is still marked as SD, when it should be UD.
That's what I was originally asking.
I'm gonna try and resend the e-mail see if someone responds this time.
Dude your confusing yourself. ;D ;D ;D They probably won't email back because there is nothing to say. It was an SD,changed to a UD,without OFFICIALLY being changed,probably because they could not be assed. Either way,Condes won by UD or SD. It's still a W.
Well what the fuck! >:mad I want it officially changed to UD. >:mad
;D
LMAO,CC in 24 you NEAT FREAK!! I bet you're like that in real life too,not just with threads and fight outcomes! ;D ;D
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
I think Niida takes a comfortable points win over Condes. Yutaki is an outstanding boxer. And the best in his division.
Re: I want to see Yutaki Niida v Florante Condes!
I've never seen Condes but is this the same Niida that fought Arambulet? I've only seen their first and "pure boxer with awesome skills" doesn't seem quite right. :D Arambulet is a pure boxer with slightly above average skills and he outboxed Niida. Niida looked a little crude and dumb to be honest. That was a while ago though.
