Re: Pavlik v Hearns at 160?
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Who wins? Both huge 169 pounders with huge power. Kelly throws way more,Hearns had far more 1 punch power but both equally destructive. Were/are both ever so slight weak in the chin department?This would be amazing for as long as it lasted imo!I think either fighter could win based on their power!
This match could go either way, Hearns could use his boxing skills, and we could have a bit of a boxing match on our hands which i would favor Hearns in. Or we could see more of a slug fest which i favor Pavlik in. We either see Hearns using his boxing skills and stopping Pavlik in 7th round with a straight right hand, or we see another Barkley vs Hearns 1 moment happening.
Re: Pavlik v Hearns at 160?
Whats with all your fantasy fights today Gamo? You trying to boost your post count so you stay ahead of the poster formerly known as IceColdBoxing going into 2008? ??? :P
Re: Pavlik v Hearns at 160?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo
Whats with all your fantasy fights today Gamo? You trying to boost your post count so you stay ahead of the poster formerly known as IceColdBoxing going into 2008? ??? :P
It's quality not quantity me old son ;D ;) I was just bored with the same old fights here so thought I'd add some newer,fresher ones.
Re: Pavlik v Hearns at 160?
Pavlik beats Hearns, the same way Barkley did in their 1988 fight; takes a shellacking before sparking a tiring Hearns in about 7.
Re: Pavlik v Hearns at 160?
Pavlik the naturally bigger guy would win.It would be Hagler vs Hearns all over again