WBC laying down the law on their champions
Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.
Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?
Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
I'd prefer for him to fight Kats, but Santa Cruz does deserve the re-match. I say give SC another go around with Joel
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.
Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?
Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.
david is the full WBC champion... casa was either the WBC interim champ, and/or the #1 for the WBC belt...
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
Why can't the WBC put Diaz and Santa Cruz together? I mean they own both titles and can do whatever needs to be done. Give Santa Cruz another WBC shot........but I wouldnt care which belt he fought for. I want to see a Katsidis fight.
An alternative would be to give Santa Cruz a double interim belt.
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
Tough shit for Diaconu, he was the one who pulled out and he isnt the draw in that fight. Dawson shouldnt have to wait around for him. I think they dropped the Casa Santa Cruz rematch, which is questionable....
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar_shaw
I'd prefer for him to fight Kats, but Santa Cruz does deserve the re-match. I say give SC another go around with Joel
i say forget joel for now and have a cruz kats fight. we all know joel lost therfor cruz should fight for the title not joel.
Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.
Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?
Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.
In the words of James tony.
WBC stands for We Be Crooks.
