Printable View
in this thread i want people to state unpopular opinions they have about boxing without the fear of being sad click.
mine would be that if PBF was still at 130 he would beat barrera morales JMM and PAC. most people say i'm crazy but thats just the way i feel.
I don't give a shit if I get sadclicked or not, Cotto beat Chop down into taking a knee. How 'bout that one? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
Also, I like Floyd, but an Erik Morales beater the man is not. Pac & Barrera? Maybe Pac but you have to also take into accord that when those two names (Morales & Barrera) got near him in the division & rankings...Floyd moved up to face nobodies. Hmmmmmm...nope. Sadclick me all you want. Morales would eat Floyd for lunch.
Holyfield was the greatest heavweight of the last 25 years, by a fairly large distance ;)
Its hard for me to see how Ali's style would of worked against someone of Lewis's style, size, and power.
Joe Louis would be a champ in any era, Lennox Lewis is more dominant than most of us give him credit for. Foreman would have had a much more brilliant career had he not fought Ali the way he did, and may have never lost to Ali had they fought in the states. Tyson would be no one if he was coming up in the 90's instead of the 80's. Hagler would have KO'd Bernard, but if they fought a rematch Hopkins would have him figured out and win. B Hop would not have stood a chance against Hearns though, just something about old Tommy. B Hop could have beaten Roy Jones in a rematch any time in the last 10 years easily.
I could go on but oh well :)
Sugar Shane Mosley is the best 147 pound fighter in the world. I Know he could be PBF, ZAB, and ZOO, He had a hard time at 154 because of Winky and I will always stand by my word that Shane Mosley would KO Tito.
I feel it Prince Naz was Still boxing, he would beat anybody in his weight class besides Barrer.
mike tyson was shockingly ovverated
everyone needs to leave kiltchko alone, hes better than you all think
everyone needs to stop comparing out heavyweight to previous boxers, "who in their prime could have beaten anyone"
Quote:
Originally Posted by purefire21
Couldn't see Naz beating Morales, are we allowed to comment on these or we just seeing who thinks what ??? LOL
i think naz would be morales.
naz has a unique style, something moales wouldnt be able to adapt to
i take nothing away form erik, a fatastic fighter and very exctiting to watch
I think your underestimating Morales boxing skills, Morales is on par with Barrera when it comes to boxing, I think Morales would of took NAZ's shots and even mixed it up more than what Barrera did to NAZ.
Morales's combo's and faints are some of the best I have ever seen, He would of beat NAZ definately.
Pac has got a weird style, it totally dazzled Barrera, Morales dealt with it really well I think !!
paq has a weird style yes, but there was a load of controversy over the gloves.
morales chose a softer glove (as you could against paq) manny's team claimed that had the gloves been firmer paq would ahve been able to KO Erik with no problem.
i think the words used were "like wearing cushions on your hands"
but then again they would say that wouldnt they
After watching Kevin Kelley damn near end Naz mania, I don't think he would have fared very well against those dynamite of Pac, Erik's nasty streak or of course MAB on any night, his win was soooo freaking one sided.
Well yeah, pretty much :-XQuote:
Originally Posted by alex w
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex w
Doesn't matter what gloves Pac wore it was obvious who was the better boxer out of the 2.
Anyway that doesn't have anything to do with the fact that your saying That Naz would beat Morales, I just could not see that happening.
Morales too fast, chin the best in the business, too skillful, the end !!