So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
I think Cona has met his match now and is getting to find Marquez technically too good for him. Hes getting old and I think Marquez will have the tools to win the majority of the rounds against him. Im thinking either a wide UD for Marquez here.
Note how his name is also Conamayor to please VD. Sick of him calling all of Brit fighters Frauds or Cons, here is a taste of your on medicine mate ;D
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
I think Cona has met his match now and is getting to find Marquez technically too good for him. Hes getting old and I think Marquez will have the tools to win the majority of the rounds against him. Im thinking either a wide UD for Marquez here.
Not how his name is also Conamayor to please VD. Sick of him calling all of Brit fighters Frauds or Cons, here is a taste of your on medicine mate ;D
so u dissrespect a great fighter who has given us great showings for many years just to take a shot at the forums biggest losser?
You are a knob.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
He gets on at my favourtie fighter, why cant I dish some back :confused:
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
He gets on at my favourtie fighter, why cant I dish some back :confused:
Because the case for Froch being a Fraud is perfectly valid, as he is a completely unproven 32 year old prospect who has fought domestic level competition and has a style that almost surely will not work consistently against top fighters. Casamayor is an ATG who is well past it, but still a crafty veteran champion. In my opinion the only thing Froch being from the UK has to do with the flak he gets is because if he were from America he would've already been in with better fighters and been "exposed" himself.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Well its every British fighter that falls into this catagory really, so why cant I dish a bit back ? and from has just turned 31 2 weeks ago ;D
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
He's not making names like that for establish legends, just Khan and Froch, two unproven fighters. And Froch is a fraud imo, I actually subscribe to that.
At this point, Casamayor can't be exposed. I do think Marquez would win but don't be surprised if he hits the deck.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Well its every British fighter that falls into this catagory really, so why cant I dish a bit back ? and from has just turned 31 2 weeks ago ;D
I understand. VD does make me laugh with the Brit names he has. A Mere Con is a classic, you have to admit that even being from the UK :D Pretty harsh to call Froch Fraud as nobody knows what he's like with higher competition coz he ain't shared a ring with one yet. He's done more than fine with domestic level. Ain't his fault he can't get a good name on his record. He's called out Calzaghe numerous time, called Taylor out and Inkin pulled out twice. Nobody wants a part of him.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
He even said himself he hates every fighter from Britiain just because they are British. Im not trying to have a stab at Casa here, I actually like him, its just a little hit on VD.
No quarms here boys. ;D
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
I think people should go easy on Froch. You can't blame him for not wanting a strap and calling out the big names. I'm fine people callling him Fraud if he fights a top name and gets beat but wait until that happens to start the hate campaign ;)
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Well its every British fighter that falls into this catagory really, so why cant I dish a bit back ? and from has just turned 31 2 weeks ago ;D
I understand. VD does make me laugh with the Brit names he has. A Mere Con is a classic, you have to admit that even being from the UK :D Pretty harsh to call Froch Fraud as nobody knows what he's like with higher competition coz he ain't shared a ring with one yet. He's done more than fine with domestic level. Ain't his fault he can't get a good name on his record. He's called out Calzaghe numerous time, called Taylor out and Inkin pulled out twice. Nobody wants a part of him.
Couldn't he have fought Calzaghe at one point?
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
Well its every British fighter that falls into this catagory really, so why cant I dish a bit back ? and from has just turned 31 2 weeks ago ;D
I understand. VD does make me laugh with the Brit names he has. A Mere Con is a classic, you have to admit that even being from the UK :D Pretty harsh to call Froch Fraud as nobody knows what he's like with higher competition coz he ain't shared a ring with one yet. He's done more than fine with domestic level. Ain't his fault he can't get a good name on his record. He's called out Calzaghe numerous time, called Taylor out and Inkin pulled out twice. Nobody wants a part of him.
Couldn't he have fought Calzaghe at one point?
Froch has called Calzaghe out for years on end. Instead he goes an fights the mighty Peter Manfredo.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Tan is just trash talking with friendly connotation. I'll allow it!
But personally, if anyone is going to struggle, I think Marquez will. Casamayor's style will give Marquez the fits. We all know he's suceptible to short/straight left hands and Casamayor will find his mark with that punch. ALSO, like I've always been saying, Casa fights dirty and I'm curious to see how Marquez handles it. I'll be rooting for Marquez because I'm a fan and it would set up Pacquiao vs Marquez III.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
I always think casa is on the brink of a letdown, but it never comes. Casa will find a way to win, just my guess.
Re: So will Marquez expose Conamayor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
He gets on at my favourtie fighter, why cant I dish some back :confused:
Anone who has a go at Froch has very good reason to. The guy has never beaten a top 30 fighter yet he goes on about how good he is non stop. Anyone in the top 20 would have his record if they'd fought his level of opponent.
On the other hand we have Joel Casamayor. A guy who has faced such lightweight legends as Corrales, Castillo, Freitas, Campbell. He has either beat these guys or lost close and controversial decisions. After a long lay off he got a gift decision against Santa Cruz, but just as everyone was writing him off he got up from the Canvas to beat Katsidis.
To even joke about him being a con is just childish and uninformed. U wanna make VD look bad? Then brush up on your knowledge and beat him in an intelligent debate. Yeah VD talks shit, hates on British fighters, and talks up the whole gangsta thing but he does know a lot more about boxing than you. Anyone can see that.