Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Forget Ricky Hatton, let him fight fellow loser Oscar De La Hoya, the fight all the real fight fans will want to see next year is Pacquaio vs Mayweather Jr.
I'd say it's as close to a boxing certainty that you can get that Floyd will be coming out of retirement now to take on Manny in a true boxing megafight.
You would have the universally recognised, undisputed best two fighters on the planet fighting each other for all the glory.
When was the last time it happened in the history of boxing that the two unquestioned best p4p fighters have fought each other?
I know Jones and Toney were both near the top of the p4p when they fought but were they hands down 1 and 2 like Floyd and Manny are, I don't think so?
This fight will be mega, I can't wait for this. :cool:
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Hatton against Manny then the winner gets Floyd.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
I would love to see that fight.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Dont drink the kool-aid.....guzzle it !
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
sounds promising but if Floyd wins they'll say Pacquiao beat an over the hill Oscar and that him and Floyd weren't in the same weight class. smart marks will never be happy with anything Mayweather does.
Personally I'd like to see Pacquiao fight Hatton, fight of the year till it ends
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
and if Floyd wins they'll say Pacquiao beat an over the hill Oscar and that him and Floyd weren't in the same weight class.
Personally I'd like to see him fight Hatton.
Why Hatton?
Floyd is a lot smaller than Oscar and hands down the world's best fighter.
Why fight Hatton who got his ass kicked by Floyd? :confused:
Let's be real, Manny will make good money against Hatton but at least double against Floyd.
Him and Floyd is a megafight, the Americans need an American fighter involved to truly have it being a plus 1 million ppv fight and besides fightfans want to see the world's very best go at it.
Hatton and Manny is a great fight for sure, but Floyd and Manny completely and utterly eclipses it.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
and if Floyd wins they'll say Pacquiao beat an over the hill Oscar and that him and Floyd weren't in the same weight class.
Personally I'd like to see him fight Hatton.
Why Hatton?
Floyd is a lot smaller than Oscar and hands down the world's best fighter.
Why fight Hatton who got his ass kicked by Floyd? :confused:
Let's be real, Manny will make good money against Hatton but at least double against Floyd.
Him and Floyd is a megafight, the Americans need an American fighter involved to truly have it being a plus 1 million ppv fight and besides fightfans want to see the world's very best go at it.
Hatton and Manny is a great fight for sure, but Floyd and Manny completely and utterly eclipses it.
Hatton because Manny can make 140 and it would be nice to see how he can operate. Hatton because at the moment he is the best 140 pounder in the world.
Hatton because Manny could do something shane Mosley didnt, Shane skipped 140 and went to 147 to face oscar and stayed, Manny could move down and beat the guy that just unified two titles down at 140 and add more to his history.
Any fight with Mayweather right now is a name fight, and Manny just had one against the biggest name, I want Pacquiao if he beats Hatton to win the titles at 140 with a win. Does more for boxing and his legacy for a Pacquiao Hatton fight then a Pacquiao Mayweather fight imo.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
and if Floyd wins they'll say Pacquiao beat an over the hill Oscar and that him and Floyd weren't in the same weight class.
Personally I'd like to see him fight Hatton.
Why Hatton?
Floyd is a lot smaller than Oscar and hands down the world's best fighter.
Why fight Hatton who got his ass kicked by Floyd? :confused:
Let's be real, Manny will make good money against Hatton but at least double against Floyd.
Him and Floyd is a megafight, the Americans need an American fighter involved to truly have it being a plus 1 million ppv fight and besides fightfans want to see the world's very best go at it.
Hatton and Manny is a great fight for sure, but Floyd and Manny completely and utterly eclipses it.
Hatton because Manny can make 140 and it would be nice to see how he can operate. Hatton because at the moment he is the best 140 pounder in the world.
Hatton because Manny could do something shane Mosley didnt, Shane skipped 140 and went to 147 to face oscar and stayed, Manny could move down and beat the guy that just unified two titles down at 140 and add more to his history.
Any fight with Mayweather right now is a name fight, and Manny just had one against the biggest name, I want Pacquiao if he beats Hatton to win the titles at 140 with a win. Does more for boxing and his legacy for a Pacquiao Hatton fight then a Pacquiao Mayweather fight imo.
You think Manny beating Hatton would do more for his legacy than beating Floyd? :confused:
I'm stunned into silence :-X
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
i really wouldnt mind seeing this fight. but i still pick floyd to win.
i will just have to wait for the Pac vs PBF poll cause im sure there will be one. ;)
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
and if Floyd wins they'll say Pacquiao beat an over the hill Oscar and that him and Floyd weren't in the same weight class.
Personally I'd like to see him fight Hatton.
Why Hatton?
Floyd is a lot smaller than Oscar and hands down the world's best fighter.
Why fight Hatton who got his ass kicked by Floyd? :confused:
Let's be real, Manny will make good money against Hatton but at least double against Floyd.
Him and Floyd is a megafight, the Americans need an American fighter involved to truly have it being a plus 1 million ppv fight and besides fightfans want to see the world's very best go at it.
Hatton and Manny is a great fight for sure, but Floyd and Manny completely and utterly eclipses it.
Hatton because Manny can make 140 and it would be nice to see how he can operate. Hatton because at the moment he is the best 140 pounder in the world.
Hatton because Manny could do something shane Mosley didnt, Shane skipped 140 and went to 147 to face oscar and stayed, Manny could move down and beat the guy that just unified two titles down at 140 and add more to his history.
Any fight with Mayweather right now is a name fight, and Manny just had one against the biggest name, I want Pacquiao if he beats Hatton to win the titles at 140 with a win. Does more for boxing and his legacy for a Pacquiao Hatton fight then a Pacquiao Mayweather fight imo.
Your theory is absurd! Fighting Mayweather just a name fight? Since when is an undefeated 5 division champ just a name?
No way in hell beating Hatton at 140 means more than beating Mayweather. PBF KTFO Hatton for crying out loud.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Manny needs another belt. I hope he fights HAtton next. After Hatton he can face MAyweather.:cool:
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
I wouldnt mind seeing Hatton/Pac but it's not a fight Ricky will win. And Im a HUGE Hatton fan. But even I cant come up with fantasy scenario that ends with Ricky being competetive more than a couple rounds.
That said, there's plent of competetion for Ricky at 140, lets talk about Pac/Mayweather.
IF, and its a big IF I think, Floyd can be coaxed back into a mega-ppv-p4p fight with Manny, it would be a blockbuster fargon event.
The superior boxing of Mayweather against the nimble whirlwhind that is Pacquiao. Wow. Manny takes an absolute hell of a shot and Ive yet to see him fight scared. Floyd makes folks pay for missing and has the defense of a deflated James Toney. This is a win-win fight for the fans and MUST be made.
My prediction: Manny by SD in an unbelivable entertaining, action packed and VERY close fight.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Why Hatton?
Floyd is a lot smaller than Oscar and hands down the world's best fighter.
Why fight Hatton who got his ass kicked by Floyd? :confused:
Let's be real, Manny will make good money against Hatton but at least double against Floyd.
Him and Floyd is a megafight, the Americans need an American fighter involved to truly have it being a plus 1 million ppv fight and besides fightfans want to see the world's very best go at it.
Hatton and Manny is a great fight for sure, but Floyd and Manny completely and utterly eclipses it.
Hatton because Manny can make 140 and it would be nice to see how he can operate. Hatton because at the moment he is the best 140 pounder in the world.
Hatton because Manny could do something shane Mosley didnt, Shane skipped 140 and went to 147 to face oscar and stayed, Manny could move down and beat the guy that just unified two titles down at 140 and add more to his history.
Any fight with Mayweather right now is a name fight, and Manny just had one against the biggest name, I want Pacquiao if he beats Hatton to win the titles at 140 with a win. Does more for boxing and his legacy for a Pacquiao Hatton fight then a Pacquiao Mayweather fight imo.
Your theory is absurd! Fighting Mayweather just a name fight? Since when is an undefeated 5 division champ just a name?
No way in hell beating Hatton at 140 means more than beating Mayweather. PBF KTFO Hatton for crying out loud.
Yes Mayweather beat Hatton, Hatton went back to 140 and now holds two titles there.
If Pacquiao beats Hatton he also holds two belts at 140 which adds more to his championships. At the moment Mayweather holds no titles and is "retired". If you want Floyd to fight someone at 147 have him fight Williams. If you want Pacquiao to win belts are you going to put him in against Paul Williams at 147 or would you put him in against Hatton at 140?
He can do what Shane Mosley didn't and beat Oscar at 47 and then move down to 140 and win more world titles. I don't see whats so wrong with that notion.
If you want Pacquiao to fight a belt holder at 147 then pick Berto. Because Williams and Margarito should be fighting each other or Mayweather, Cotto is also in the mix up there. And I wouldnt favor Pacquiao against those guys at 147. I think a safer bet would be him vs Hatton at 140, and it would add more world titles to his collection imo.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
I love Pac for what he just did to Oscar, but I cannot picture him beating PBF. However, if I were PBF, I'd take a tune-up fight first, just to shake the rust off.
Re: Surely it will be Manny vs Floyd in 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Majesty
Hatton because Manny can make 140 and it would be nice to see how he can operate. Hatton because at the moment he is the best 140 pounder in the world.
Hatton because Manny could do something shane Mosley didnt, Shane skipped 140 and went to 147 to face oscar and stayed, Manny could move down and beat the guy that just unified two titles down at 140 and add more to his history.
Any fight with Mayweather right now is a name fight, and Manny just had one against the biggest name, I want Pacquiao if he beats Hatton to win the titles at 140 with a win. Does more for boxing and his legacy for a Pacquiao Hatton fight then a Pacquiao Mayweather fight imo.
Your theory is absurd! Fighting Mayweather just a name fight? Since when is an undefeated 5 division champ just a name?
No way in hell beating Hatton at 140 means more than beating Mayweather. PBF KTFO Hatton for crying out loud.
Yes Mayweather beat Hatton, Hatton went back to 140 and now holds two titles there.
If Pacquiao beats Hatton he also holds two belts at 140 which adds more to his championships. At the moment Mayweather holds no titles and is "retired". If you want Floyd to fight someone at 147 have him fight Williams. If you want Pacquiao to win belts are you going to put him in against Paul Williams at 147 or would you put him in against Hatton at 140?
He can do what Shane Mosley didn't and beat Oscar at 47 and then move down to 140 and win more world titles. I don't see whats so wrong with that notion.
If you want Pacquiao to fight a belt holder at 147 then pick Berto. Because Williams and Margarito should be fighting each other or Mayweather, Cotto is also in the mix up there. And I wouldnt favor Pacquiao against those guys at 147. I think a safer bet would be him vs Hatton at 140, and it would add more world titles to his collection imo.
Who cares about the belts though? Hatton and Malignaggi fought their big 'unification' title for no belts because they didn't even deem them valuable enough to bother paying the sanctioning fees for.
Joe Calzaghe moved up and fought B Hop for no belt becuase B Hop couldn't care less about keeping it and Joe couldn't care less about winning it.
When it comes to the fighters at the very top they are bigger than all the alphabet belts.
Who cares if Ricky has a paper title, he's still the guy who got ktfo by Floyd Mayweather and therefore the vast majority of people would rather see Manny in with Mayweather rather than a Mayweather victim.
The belts don't matter, look at the super featherweight divison, Manny was seen as THE man in the division, the Ring champ, universally recognised champ in that weight class long before he finally won a belt there. Barrera and Marquez were the belt holders but Manny was the champ.
