Youtube Fight Analysis Video-Froch Dirrell

I was doing some research on Dirrell and Froch on Youtube, trying to review past fights and found this video analysis. I think it is a pretty unbiased analysis and I agree with alot of what he says.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNX1SO3Uw0s

To sum it up he doesnt think the fight will go the distance and favors Froch to win but doesnt rule out a Dirrell KO.......

He also think JoeCal would have been a stylistic nightmare for Froch and Froch should be happy he is retired....;D

Heres the Taylor Abraham - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J380...eature=related
Picks Taylor by decision......

He is not bad this guy, funny enough i was checking out his prediction of Valuev and Haye and intrestingly he picks Valuev.

Fair assessment by this guy. I would recommend him to people that don't follow the sport closely.

I haven't watched this but I do remember the guy, he made a reasonable case for Hatton KO'ing Pacquaio, reasonable enough for me to think hmm, he might be right, and then nahhh. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

I haven't watched this but I do remember the guy, he made a reasonable case for Hatton KO'ing Pacquaio, reasonable enough for me to think hmm, he might be right, and then nahhh. ;D

---

Tbh though, I don't think anybody thought Pac would destroy Hatton as quick as he did. I saw it as about 60/40 in Pac's favour, but I didn't see him bulldozing him. Also seeing as I'd spent hard-earned money on a ticket, I would've liked it if he'd let him hang in there a couple more rounds.

I probably had it more like 70/30 but like always I start to figure out ways for the other guy to win as the fight gets closer.

Having watched the Froch one and about half of the Abraham one, meh, I agree and disagree with this guy. He makes it out like Froch is harder to hit than he is. And I kind of want to pick Taylor, like he does. I agree with him about Taylor in some respects and not others, he doesn't pay attention to the details and he doesn't really think in there or pick his shots but I wouldn't say he overwhelms his opponents with activity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

I probably had it more like 70/30 but like always I start to figure out ways for the other guy to win as the fight gets closer.

Having watched the Froch one and about half of the Abraham one, meh, I agree and disagree with this guy. He makes it out like Froch is harder to hit than he is. And I kind of want to pick Taylor, like he does. I agree with him about Taylor in some respects and not others, he doesn't pay attention to the details and he doesn't really think in there or pick his shots but I wouldn't say he overwhelms his opponents with activity.

---

Yeah, actually I was probably like 70/30 as well originally, but as the fight snuck up & I got more annoyed with the PacMania invasion we had at the time, I just started to get this sneaking suspicion that Hatton just had a little something that Pac couldn't handle, pushing it to 60/40. I've learnt my lesson though... although I've got this funny feeling that Miguel Cotto might just be able to... or no.

Oh & Froch is hard to hit if you don't have any of the following -

A speed advantage

A reach advantage

Competent boxing ability

Arms

;D

And Jermain Taylor does not have one of the best jabs in the sport.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

;D

And Jermain Taylor does not have one of the best jabs in the sport.

---

Hey, I said easy to hit not easy to beat. I give the credit, very few can hit him as hard as he hits back. He's a monstor for his weight u ;D