Re: Frank Warrens column..
I agree he must be on about Haye.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Warren's a dick, i hate reading his column because its always talking bad about fighters that split with him or didnt want anything to do with him (calzaghe, Froch, Haye, Hatton) :mad:
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mattboxingfan
Warren's a dick, i hate reading his column because its always talking bad about fighters that split with him or didnt want anything to do with him (calzaghe, Froch, Haye, Hatton) :mad:
Yeah I get tired of him having little digs at fighters who left him or fighters that bashed his fighters up or any successful British promotions that don't involve him.
Frank has his uses and has done a LOT for British boxing in the past and I will respect that but these days he is just a bitter bastard.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
I don't know about it being Haye as he always has good things to say about Haye...and actually Froch aswell.
Having said that, Booth has some decent guns on him and i can't think of who else it could be. Maybe it's TM and Kid Thunder.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
WOW!!!
I dont know how I missed it, but it looks like Khan and Warren have partied company, Warren at the bottom of the article says " the people involved couldnt come to an agreement " Why the fuck would he say that if he was in Khans corner??
Looks over to me.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
One thing for sure: the rumors he's talking aren't concerning Hatton for obvious reasons or any fighters working with him. Haye is the first name coming to mind because he's one of the big attraction in the UK at the moment but if he only has had good words for him, maybe we should consider another venue as an alternative. I know that A-Force did say a lot of bad things about Warren and the opposite as well, could it be that he was the one targeted? Wouldn't be impossible as Audley is trying to get some meaningful win and to revitalize his career...
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
I don't know about it being Haye as he always has good things to say about Haye...and actually Froch aswell.
Having said that, Booth has some decent guns on him and i can't think of who else it could be. Maybe it's TM and Kid Thunder.
I thought it was quite obvious he meant Haye/Booth, as soon as he says there is a strong rumour about a fighter/trainer takeing it, he then goes onto say what he thinks it is used for, bulking and moveing up weight. IMO deffo suttle hints from Franky there.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
I don't know about it being Haye as he always has good things to say about Haye...and actually Froch aswell.
Having said that, Booth has some decent guns on him and i can't think of who else it could be. Maybe it's TM and Kid Thunder.
Fortunately for him, Kid Thunder doesn't follow the shallow and dubious long distance hints of TM anymore.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
WOW!!!
I dont know how I missed it, but it looks like Khan and Warren have partied company, Warren at the bottom of the article says " the people involved couldnt come to an agreement " Why the fuck would he say that if he was in Khans corner??
Looks over to me.
Also reading between the lines "one british fighter and his trainer" suggests to me the trainer isnt British.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
I don't know about it being Haye as he always has good things to say about Haye...and actually Froch aswell.
Having said that, Booth has some decent guns on him and i can't think of who else it could be. Maybe it's TM and Kid Thunder.
I thought it was quite obvious he meant Haye/Booth, as soon as he says there is a strong rumour about a fighter/trainer takeing it, he then goes onto say what he thinks it is used for, bulking and moveing up weight. IMO deffo suttle hints from Franky there.
I actually reckon he might be talking about Khan, if it's true that they have parted company. He knows that discrediting him if he leaves him isn't a bad idea & we know he loves to do it about fighters who leave him.
It might be Haye, but I suspect it's Amir he's talking about.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
I think it is Haye as he still has ties with Amir, but if he loses him then he will talk crap about Amir too.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
WOW!!!
I dont know how I missed it, but it looks like Khan and Warren have partied company, Warren at the bottom of the article says " the people involved couldnt come to an agreement " Why the fuck would he say that if he was in Khans corner??
Looks over to me.
that measn he and the other team could not agree terms/venue...
Khan is under contract.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skel1983
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
I don't know about it being Haye as he always has good things to say about Haye...and actually Froch aswell.
Having said that, Booth has some decent guns on him and i can't think of who else it could be. Maybe it's TM and Kid Thunder.
I thought it was quite obvious he meant Haye/Booth, as soon as he says there is a strong rumour about a fighter/trainer takeing it, he then goes onto say what he thinks it is used for, bulking and moveing up weight. IMO deffo suttle hints from Franky there.
I actually reckon he might be talking about Khan, if it's true that they have parted company. He knows that discrediting him if he leaves him isn't a bad idea & we know he loves to do it about fighters who leave him.
It might be Haye, but I suspect it's Amir he's talking about.
I thought so too , with the 'British fighter and ...his trainer comment.
Re: Frank Warrens column..
I think he's having a pop at Haye and his diminutive trainer. You've got to hand it to Frank, he never misses an opportunity. :)