Originally Posted by
Taeth
I actually think an orthodox fighter may have a better chance. IMO the best way to beat Mayweather would obviously be to neutralize him with a very fast jab and back him up to the ropes and throw a lot of punches while changing angles and using head movement. IMO a guy like Gamboa lets say if he could theoretically move up to 147 over night with amazing success would have a better chance against Mayweather than Manny. I think its because Mayweather doesn't get as frozen against southpaws the same way he does sometimes against orthodox fighters. For whatever reason Mayweather fights southpaws and counters/potshots orthodox guys. I don't think Mayweather is as comfortable trying to be offensive against orthodox fighters because his style of attack doesn't utilize as many angles as guys like Pacquiao, RJJ, and Gamboa. So generally offensively he can get in his leaping left hook or a jab or even a lead right hand, but not with the same force as when he faces a southpaw. Also he is much more effective to the body against southpaws because his straight right to the body is lined up perfectly.
IMO there are a myriad of reasons why Mosley could lose to Mayweather, and I think style is the biggest reason. Mosley hasn't historically done really well against the boxer types with a great jab(except Oscar in their first fight). I think if Mayweather for his part needs to keep off the ropes if he wants to look effective on fight night, for whatever reason like RJJ he fights off the ropes way more than he should, and even though he is more effective defensively he doesn't do the things that Roy did off the ropes that won him rounds.