just one thing remember!
it would be multiple titles get rid of the fkers totally destroing the game, one weight one title the end! heaven;D
Printable View
just one thing remember!
it would be multiple titles get rid of the fkers totally destroing the game, one weight one title the end! heaven;D
I think I could handle 2 different belts, but 5 is too many.
The thing I would get rid of is the corruption/ dodgy home scoring.
man imagine the history of boxing if there was no corruption or dodgy homescoring, doesnt bare thinking abt;DQuote:
Originally Posted by 0james0
fewer weight classes - back to the good old days of 8 ;)
and fighters foerced to meet rather then duck one another. I wish.......:-\
1 weight class 1 title
Runner up was create a Boxing league a la UFC in mma
1 weight class! :lol: I don't think the Klitschkos would ever be beat. I'm sure there would be some funny match ups though.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Kabong
Its meant to be read "for each single weight class there is only 1 title"
Three things really...
Golden
Boy
Productions.....seriously though the list is enormous. But I love the sport none the less.
I agree get rid of the XYZ belts in each weight class. I don't mind to see 3 belts ( WBC, WBA , IBF ) but not no f**king 14 in each division.
If I had another thing to change I would get rid of some of the super and junior weight classes in the lower divisions up to welterweight. Between 105 and 147 there are 10 divisions that to me is absurd when there probably should be only five.
Judging. Too often it is shockingly bad, normally in favour of the house fighter.
i loved the days when there were two world champions, WBC and WBA. whenever there was a unification fight between both champions, it was fun and intriguing. i would also definitely clean up all the corruption in boxing like those idiot judges. some of those judges have absolutely knowledge or are just paid off by those corrupt promoters.
I would institute a way that would force top fighters to fight each other. F*ck shady promoters and their personal agendas. F*ck the inane posturing on which Floyd has a PhD. F*ck the million excuses why two top fighters can never meet. Baseball has playoffs. Football has playoffs. Basketball has playoffs. Tennis has seedings and brackets.
I'm sure the brilliant minds of boxing can conjure up a way to make top fighters meet in the ring. Hey, I'm all for building up to a fight between two greats. But it's a little like watching a batter step off the plate, adjust his gloves, his cup, tap his bat against his cleats, look at the 3rd base coach, adjust his gloves again, spit, etc, etc, etc. After the first two or three minutes, it starts to get old.
I would change championship fights back to 15 rounds. They eliminated some unworthy champions. Leonard could not beat Hearns in a 12 round fight but 15 round is a different story. Bernard Hopkins would have beat Taylor. Rounds 13,14 and 15 were the true championship rounds. Hagler would have beat Leonard. I do understand the health problems involved but I respected those last 3 rounds. Duran was a monster during those rounds. It would eliminated alot of garbage champions we have now.
Judges would be robots that never make mistakes scoring clean effective punching.
man i would br very happy with only 2 champions, its the next best thing i supposeQuote:
Originally Posted by milmascaras1